State v. Clark
| Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM |
| Citation | State v. Clark, 334 S.E.2d 121, 286 S.C. 432 (S.C. 1985) |
| Decision Date | 04 June 1985 |
| Docket Number | No. 22360,22360 |
| Parties | The STATE, Respondent, v. Donnie CLARK, Appellant. . Heard |
Everett Hope Garner, and S.C. Office of Appellate Defense, Columbia, for appellant.
Atty. Gen. T. Travis Medlock, Asst. Atty. Gen. Harold M. Coombs, Jr., and Staff Atty. Amie L. Clifford, and Sol. James C. Anders, Columbia, for respondent.
Appellant was convicted of conspiracy to housebreak. He alleges the trial court erred in admitting the confession of his co-defendant without sufficiently redacting references to appellant. We agree but affirm.
Appellant Clark was found near the scene of the attempted housebreaking at 3:00 a.m. He was apprehended as he drove his truck away with the headlights off.
When originally questioned, he denied knowing his co-defendant. Later it was determined the two were cousins. He admitted his co-defendant told him of the larceny plans, but denied any participation in them.
Appellant alleges he was near the scene in the middle of the night to go through the garbage dump which would help soothe him after an argument with his wife.
While we agree it was error to admit the co-defendan...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
State v. Crawford
...properly denied Follin's motion for a directed verdict as to this charge. Id. at 267, 573 S.E.2d at 829-30. See also State v. Clark, 286 S.C. 432, 334 S.E.2d 121 (1985) (finding "ample evidence... to support appellant's conviction of conspiracy" to housebreak where appellant was found near ......
-
State v. Anders
...the statement was admissible against Simmons, it should have been redacted to omit any reference to Anders. Accord, State v. Clark, 286 S.C. 432, 334 S.E.2d 121 (1985) (it is error to admit codefendant's confession without redacting references to 5. To the extent the Court of Appeals addres......
-
State v. Martin
...250, 89 S.Ct. 1726, 23 L.Ed.2d 284 (1969); Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967); State v. Clark, 286 S.C. 432, 334 S.E.2d 121 (1985). Assume arguendo that the state had rebutted the initial presumption of unreliability which attaches to codefendants' confe......
-
B. Conspiracy
...spite of an improperly admitted confession of a co-conspirator (improper for failure to react references to appellant) see State v. Clark, 286 S.C. 432, 334 S.E.2d 121, cert. denied, 474 U.S. 998 (1985). The sufficiency of the evidence of conspiracy was a significant issue in State v. Dashe......