State v. Clayton
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Writing for the Court | Sherwood |
Citation | 13 S.W. 819,100 Mo. 516 |
Decision Date | 02 June 1890 |
Parties | STATE v. CLAYTON. |
v.
CLAYTON.
ASSAULT WITH INTENT TO KILL — INDICTMENT — EVIDENCE.
1. An assault with intent to kill, which is punishable, under 1 Rev. St. Mo. 1879, § 1262, by imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term not exceeding 10 years, is a felony, within the definition of that term by section 1676, as an offense for which the offender "is liable" to be imprisoned in the penitentiary; and an indictment which fails to allege that such assault was committed with a felonious intent is bad.
2. An indictment for an assault need only charge the assault in general terms, without specifying the manner in which it was committed. Overruling State v. Jordan, 19 Mo. 212, and State v. Greenhalgh, 24 Mo. 373, and following State v. Chandler, Id. 371, and State v. Chumley, 67 Mo. 41.
3. On a trial for assault with intent to kill, evidence is inadmissible as to the killing of a third person by the prosecuting witness a few minutes before defendant made his assault, at which encounter defendant was not present, and with which he was not shown to have been connected; and where, on the admission of such evidence, the court promises to withdraw it if defendant's connection is not shown, it is error to permit such evidence to go to the jury with the court's approval impressed on it.
4. Where there is nothing to show that the prosecuting witness was acting as a peace-officer at the time of the assault, it is error to admit evidence that he then held the office of town marshal. BARCLAY, J., dissenting.
Appeal from circuit court, Hickory county; W. I. WALLACE, Judge.
Indictment of William C. Clayton for an assault with intent to kill, committed on the person of one Thomas G. Allen. Evidence on the part of the state was admitted, showing that, a few minutes before the assault, Allen had shot and killed one Charley Clayton. J. H. Kinney, a witness for the state, testified: "The difficulty between Tom Allen and W. C. Clayton occurred at Holmes' store. I was at the store when Bill Clayton shot at Tom Allen. When Clayton stepped in the door, and Tom Allen pointed his pistol, I was in range of Allen's pistol, and stepped outside. Clayton fired, and I can't say whether Tom Allen fired or not. Tom Allen was in the back part of the store, standing in the door. Clayton was near the front door, partly behind a stack of goods, and shot from behind a box of goods. Clayton, when he fired, was about 60 to 65 feet from Allen. Tom Allen had pistol in his right hand, pointing towards Clayton. Clayton was rather behind stack of goods, pointing his pistol around. Next I saw of Allen, he was crossing the street east and west. Clayton came out at front door. One shot was fired, and, I thought, two. Allen was standing still with pistol when Clayton fired. When Clayton came in, Allen drew his pistol down on Clayton. Tom Allen was standing in back door when Bill Clayton came in at front door, and Allen drew his pistol on Clayton a little before Clayton pointed his at Allen. Bill then presented his pistol. Clayton was eight or ten feet from the front door when he fired. Clayton did not say anything when he came in, that I heard. Don't remember of his saying anything at any time." Defendant was found guilty, and now appeals. 1 Rev. St. Mo. 1879, § 1262, provides: "Every person who shall, on purpose and of malice aforethought, shoot at or stab another, * * * with intent to kill such person, * * * shall be punished by imprisonment in the penitentiary not exceeding 10 years." Section 1676 is as follows: "The term `felony' * * * shall be construed to mean any offense for which the offender, on conviction, shall be liable by law to be punished with death or imprisonment in the penitentiary."
Amos S. Smith, for appellant. John M. Wood, Atty. Gen., for the State.
SHERWOOD, J.
The charging part of the indictment in this cause is the following: "that Wm. C. Clayton, late of the county aforesaid, on or about the 17th day of June, 1886, at the county of Hickory, state aforesaid, did upon the body of one Thos. G. Allen, then and there being, feloniously, on
purpose, and willfully, with a deadly weapon, to-wit, a revolving pistol loaded with gunpowder and leaden balls, which he, the said Wm. C. Clayton, then and there had and held, did then and there make an assault with intent him, the said Thos....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Malone, 30987.
...State v. Hanson, 231 Mo. 14; State v. Palmer, 281 Mo. 525; State v. Bostwick, 245 Mo. 483; State v. Jones, 256 S.W. 787; State v. Clayton, 100 Mo. 516; State v. Fletcher, 190 S.W. 317. (b) The difficulties between appellant and deceased, that intervened between the Bean trouble and the kill......
-
Arcadia Realty Co. v. City of St. Louis., 30198.
...the plaintiffs suffer a special damage for which they may recover. Heinrich v. St. Louis. 125 Mo. 424; Glaessner v. Anheuser-Busch Co., 100 Mo. 516; Autenreith v. Railroad Co., 36 Mo. App. 254; Dries v. St. Joseph, 98 Mo. App. 611; Ellis v. Railroad, 131 Mo. App. 395; Texarkana v. Leach, 66......
-
State v. Parker, 8256
...of it from Sallee's story is that here were two men willing to fight, one with his fists, the other with a blackjack. In State v. Clayton, 100 Mo. 516, 13 S.W. 819, 18 Am.St.Rep. 565, it was said at 13 S.W. '* * * There was no testimony whatever that Allen was acting in his official capacit......
-
State v. Gadwood, 34750.
...clear inference from the facts in evidence is that the deceased had no such lawful right. Secs. 3975, 4029, R.S. 1929; State v. Clayton, 100 Mo. 516, 13 S.W. 819; State v. Jamerson, 252 S.W. Roy McKittrick, Attorney General, Olliver W. Nolen and John W. Hoffman, Assistant Attorneys General,......
-
State v. Malone, No. 30987.
...State v. Hanson, 231 Mo. 14; State v. Palmer, 281 Mo. 525; State v. Bostwick, 245 Mo. 483; State v. Jones, 256 S.W. 787; State v. Clayton, 100 Mo. 516; State v. Fletcher, 190 S.W. 317. (b) The difficulties between appellant and deceased, that intervened between the Bean trouble and the kill......
-
Arcadia Realty Co. v. City of St. Louis., No. 30198.
...the plaintiffs suffer a special damage for which they may recover. Heinrich v. St. Louis. 125 Mo. 424; Glaessner v. Anheuser-Busch Co., 100 Mo. 516; Autenreith v. Railroad Co., 36 Mo. App. 254; Dries v. St. Joseph, 98 Mo. App. 611; Ellis v. Railroad, 131 Mo. App. 395; Texarkana v. Leach, 66......
-
State v. Parker, No. 8256
...of it from Sallee's story is that here were two men willing to fight, one with his fists, the other with a blackjack. In State v. Clayton, 100 Mo. 516, 13 S.W. 819, 18 Am.St.Rep. 565, it was said at 13 S.W. '* * * There was no testimony whatever that Allen was acting in his official capacit......
-
State v. Shelton, No. 25745
...included in that charged against him. Appellant relies upon the following cases in support of his assignment: State v. Clayton, 100 Mo. 516, 13 S. W. 819, 18 Am. St. Rep. 565; State v. Doyle, 107 Mo. 36, 17 S. W. 751; State v. Davis, 121 Mo. 404, 26 S. W. 568; State v. Fairlamb, 121 Mo. 137......