State v. Cloud

Decision Date25 May 1908
PartiesSTATE ex rel. BOWLAND v. CLOUD.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

In banc. Mandamus proceedings by state of Missouri, on relation of Robert A. Bowland, against W. B. Cloud. Peremptory writ awarded.

This is an original proceeding, instituted in this court by the relator and against the respondent, as clerk of the county court of Greene county, to compel the latter to file the declaration of the former as a candidate for the office of treasurer of that county on the Republican ticket, in compliance with an act of the Legislature of 1907, entitled "An act to provide for party nominations by direct vote." Laws of Missouri, 1907, p. 264, § 5. The petition and alternative writ of mandamus states, in substance, that the relator, on April 22, 1908, with a view to placing himself upon the official ballot of said Greene county, Mo., as the candidate for the office of treasurer on the Republican ticket, signed and verified the declaration required by law, giving his full name and residence, designating the office for which he proposes to be a candidate, and the date of the primary election at which his claims are to be submitted, and named the party upon whose ticket he is to be a candidate, which affidavit and declaration are in the form prescribed by the section of the act mentioned. Relator further states that on the 22d day of April, 1908, he presented to the said W. B. Cloud, as such clerk, at his office, the said declaration, with the view of having the same filed, and with the view of having his name printed on the official ballot, so as to have submitted his claims for nomination as county treasurer on the Republican ticket at the primary election, to be held on the said first Tuesday in August, 1908. Relator further states that said W. B. Cloud, as such clerk, refused to accept said declaration, and refused to file the same, and refused to mark the same filed, and refused to consider relator as a candidate for such office, and refused to publish his name on said official ballot, for the alleged reason that the relator is not eligible to said office. Relator states that on said pretext the said clerk returned to petitioner the said declaration, with the following indorsement thereon: "Springfield, Missouri, ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • State ex rel. Donnell v. Osborn
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 19 Febrero 1941
  • State ex rel. Bothwell v. Green
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 21 Abril 1944
    ... ... Art. 6, Sec. 3, Const. of Mo.; State ex rel. Bowland v. Cloud, 212 Mo. 481; State ex rel. Borman v. Offutt, 9 S.W. (2d) 595; State ex rel. Haliburton v. Roach, 230 Mo. 408; State ex rel. Husse v. Hayden, 163 S.W. (2d) 946; State ex rel. Nolan v. Nelson, 275 S.W. 927; State ex rel. Scott v. Dircks, 211 Mo. 568; State ex rel. Scott v. Hayden, 163 S.W. (2d) 946; ... ...
  • State ex rel. Bothwell v. Green
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 21 Abril 1944
    ... ... mandamus to compel the respondent to accept the relator's ... declaration of candidacy for a county office and to require ... respondent to place relator's name upon the ballot. Art ... 6, Sec. 3, Const. of Mo.; State ex rel. Bowland v ... Cloud, 212 Mo. 481; State ex rel. Borman v ... Offutt, 9 S.W.2d 595; State ex rel. Haliburton v ... Roach, 230 Mo. 408; State ex rel. Husse v ... Hayden, 163 S.W.2d 946; State ex rel. Nolan v ... Nelson, 275 S.W. 927; State ex rel. Scott v ... Dircks, 211 Mo. 568; State ex rel. Scott v ... ...
  • State ex rel. Donnell v. Osburn
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 19 Febrero 1941
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT