State v. O'Connell
| Decision Date | 06 October 1953 |
| Docket Number | No. 1041,1041 |
| Citation | 118 Vt. 55,99 A.2d 705 |
| Court | Vermont Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE v. O'CONNELL. |
Philip M. M. Phelps, Fair Haven, for plaintiff.
Robert T. Stafford, Deputy Atty. Gen., for defendant.
Before SHERBURNE, C. J., JEFFORDS, CLEARY, and ADAMS, JJ., and CHASE, Superior Judge.
The petitioner, after indictment and trial by jury at the September 1947 term of Rutland county court, was acquitted of murder by reason of insanity, and committed to the state prison where he is still confined under the provisions of V.S. 47, § 2462. He has petitioned the Rutland county court the a discharge from confinement under the provisions of V.S. 47, § 2464. Hearing was had by the court, findings of fact were filed and an order made dismissing the petition without prejudice. The case is here on the petitioner's exceptions to the findings of fact and to the judgment order.
The petitioner has briefed only one exception, 'that the findings are not supported by the evidence.' The findings of the trial court must stand if there is legitimate evidence fairly and reasonably tending to support them. Harrison v. Harrison, 110 Vt. 254, 257, 4 A.2d 348; Schwarz v. Avery, 113 Vt. 175, 180, 31 A.2d 916; Haskins v. Haskins' Estate, 113 Vt. 466, 470, 35 A.2d 662; Sparrow v. Cimonetti, 115 Vt. 292, 297, 58 A.2d 875.
The petitioner states the law correctly that in determining whether the findings are supported by the evidence, the evidence most be considered as a whole, and not piecemeal, citing Colby's Executor v. Poor, 115 Vt. 147, 153, 154, 55 A.2d 605; and that the Supreme Court is bound to construe a record reasonably, and this requirement applies to every part of the record, citing McGann v. Capital Savings Bank, 117 Vt. 179, 183, 89 A.2d 123. But the finding must stand if it can be supported upon any rational view of the evidence, Colby's Executor v. Poor, 115 Vt. 147, 152, 55 A.2d 605, and a finding must stand if supported by any substantial evidence, although there may be inconsistencies, or even substantial evidence to the contrary. Petition of Citizens Utilities Company, 117 Vt. 285, 287, 91 A.2d 687.
It appeared that at his previous trial for murder there was evidence from the petitioner's own psychiatrist that the petitioner was a constitutional psychopathic inferior. At the hearing now being considered there was evidence that such a person is unable to meet the stress and strain which might confront him in normal life; that such a condition is inherent; that there is really no recovery until much later in life than the petitioner's present age, when his drive has spent itself; that it is a characteristic that such a person does not control himself, particularly in his usual relations with the community at large; that such a person is born with it and cannot help it; that the judgment of such a person is usually poor, that he continues to do the things that a normally sane person would not do; that he is more likely to use liquor than a normal person and more likely to demonstrate homicidal tendencies under stress and strain than a normal person; that the petitioner had used intoxicating liquor just previous to the killing and that since then he has not had access to it; that there is no way of knowing what the petitioner will do if he is released and at best what his course of conduct will be must be a matter of speculation.
The petitioner takes the position that the evidence given at the trial of 1948 should be disregarded, and that the evidence given at the hearing on the present petition is controlling. But the evidence that the petitioner was a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Laplante v. Eastman
...chancellor so the exception is of no avail. E. A. Strout Realty Agency, Inc., v. Wooster, 118 Vt. 66, 74, 99 A.2d 689; State v. O'Connell, 118 Vt. 55, 56, 99 A.2d 705. Findings 9, 10, 12, 13 and 14 are merely supplementary to finding 7; so it is immaterial whether or not these later finding......
-
State v. Rowell, 1126
...reasonably tending to support it, although there may be inconsistencies, or even substantial evidence to the contrary. State v. O'Connell, 118 Vt. 55, 57, 99 A.2d 705. The undisputed evidence showed that on February 24, 1956, the respondent was driving a Vermont registered motor tractor. Th......
-
City of Montpelier v. Bennett
...if reasonably possible, when considered as a whole. Sparrow v. Cimonetti, supra, 115 Vt. 292, 297-298, 58 A.2d 875; State v. O'Connell, 118 Vt. 55, 58, 99 A.2d 705; Bagalio v. Hoar, 118 Vt. 384, 388, 110 A.2d In order to better understand our discussion of the exceptions to the findings and......
- Gray v. Janicki, 241
-
The Peake Murder Trial the Thirteenth Vermont Judicial History Seminar
...87. Doherty, 75 Vt. at 385. 88. Rogers v. State, 77 Vt. 454, 495 (1905). 89. State v. Blair, 118 Vt. 81, 98 (1953). 90. State v. O'Connell, 118 Vt. 55, 57 (1953). 91. State v. Smith, 140 Vt. 247, 258 (1981). 92. State v. Smith, 136 Vt. at 524; State v. Hanson, 134 Vt. 227, 232 (1976). 93. S......
-
The Peake Murder Trial the Thirteenth Vermont Judicial History Seminar
...87. Doherty, 75 Vt. at 385. 88. Rogers v. State, 77 Vt. 454, 495 (1905). 89. State v. Blair, 118 Vt. 81, 98 (1953). 90. State v. O'Connell, 118 Vt. 55, 57 (1953). 91. State v. Smith, 140 Vt. 247, 258 (1981). 92. State v. Smith, 136 Vt. at 524; State v. Hanson, 134 Vt. 227, 232 (1976). 93. S......