State v. Cook

Decision Date12 October 1959
Docket NumberNo. 1,No. 47312,47312,1
CitationState v. Cook, 327 S.W.2d 854 (Mo. 1959)
PartiesSTATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Roy Edwin COOK, Appellant
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Ray Mabee, Galena, for appellant.

John M. Dalton, Atty. Gen., Donald D. Guffey, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

HOUSER, Commissioner.

Roy Edwin Cook, tried in the Circuit Court of Stone County and there convicted of the crime of robbery in the first degree with a dangerous and deadly weapon, and sentenced to seven years in the state penitentiary, appeals from the judgment of conviction. Appellant has filed no brief on appeal.

We are precluded from the consideration of any matters required to be preserved in a motion for a new trial, by reason of the fact that appellant filed no motion for a new trial. State v. Parker, Mo.Sup., 310 S.W.2d 923.

An examination of the record as required by Supreme Court Rule 28.02, 42 V.A.M.S., reveals no error. The pertinent allegations of the information, which charged robbery in the first degree by means of a dangerous and deadly weapon, follow almost identically the language of the information approved as sufficient in State v. Maddox, Mo.Sup., 250 S.W.2d 971. And see State v. Yates, Mo.Sup., 252 S.W. 641. The verdict of the jury found defendant guilty of 'robbery in the first degree, as charged in the information,' and assessed appellant's punishment at imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of seven years. The verdict was definite; it made a finding with reference to the same offense with which the appellant was charged in the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • State v. Deckard
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 12, 1962
    ...matters required to be presented to the trial court in a motion for new trial are not preserved for review under this record. State v. Cook, Mo., 327 S.W.2d 854; State v. Graves, 352 Mo. 1102, 182 S.W.2d 46; State v. Hardy, 339 Mo. 897, 98 S.W.2d 593, 595[4, 7]; State v. Hurtt, Mo., 338 S.W......
  • State v. Holbert, 52100
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 12, 1968
    ...the consideration of any matters required to be preserved in a motion for new trial. Supreme Court Rule 27.20(a), V.A.M.R.; State v. Cook, Mo.Sup., 327 S.W.2d 854. However, defendant contends that he is entitled to a full review by this Court of the entire record under S.Ct. Rule 27.20(c), ......
  • State v. Barker, 56195
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • April 10, 1972
    ...for new trial was not filed precludes us from consideration of matters required to be preserved in a motion for new trial.' State v. Cook, Mo., 327 S.W.2d 854; State v. Green, Mo., 438 S.W.2d 274. Furthermore, even though there could be some temptation to disregard such an established princ......
  • State v. Malloyd
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • October 11, 1965
    ...for new trial was not filed precludes us from consideration of matters required to be preserved in a motion for new trial. State v. Cook, Mo., 327 S.W.2d 854. The judgment is All of the Judges concur. ...