State v. Cooper

CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court
CitationState v. Cooper, 331 A.2d 28, 66 N.J. 329 (N.J. 1974)
Decision Date29 October 1974
PartiesSTATE of New Jersey v. Ross L. COOPER.

Petition for certification denied. (See 129 N.J.Super. 229, 322 A.2d 836)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Vickey v. Nessler
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • 25 Enero 1989
    ...25 N.J. 298, 302-303, 135 A.2d 859 (1957); State v. Cooper, 129 N.J.Super. 229, 231, 322 A.2d 836 (App.Div.), certif. den. 66 N.J. 329, 331 A.2d 28 (1974). Consistent with this principle, certain rights are accorded defendants charged with certain traffic offenses: Miranda warnings are requ......
  • State v. Perlstein
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • 31 Diciembre 1985
    ... ... Based on the facts as stated above, it is clear that defendant was not charged with a crime. It is well settled that Motor Vehicle violations are only quasi-criminal in nature. Motor Vehicles Div. v. Levine, 190 N.J.Super. 2, 6, 461 A.2d 754 (App.Div.1983); State v. Cooper, 129 N.J.Super. 229, 231, 322 A.2d 836 (App.Div.1974), certif. den. 66 N.J. 329, 331 [502 A.2d 86] A.2d 28 (1974). But defendant's argument that it also does not apply to a lesser-included offense totally lacks merit. A lesser-included offense would still be a crime. See N.J.S.A. 2C:1-8. For ... ...
  • State v. Feintuch
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • 6 Junio 1977
    ...27 N.J. 348, 353, 142 A.2d 874 (1958); State v. Cooper, 129 N.J.Super. 229, 231, 322 A.2d 836 (App.Div.1974), certif. den. 66 N.J. 329, 331 A.2d 28 (1974). See also, State v. Johnson, 42 N.J. 146, 156, 199 A.2d 809 (1964); State v. DiCarlo, 67 N.J. 321, 327, 338 A.2d 809 (1975). However, th......
  • City of Independence v. Peterson
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • 4 Abril 1977
    ...jurisdictions which have applied the presumption. In State v. Cooper, 129 N.J.Super. 229, 322 A.2d 836 (1974) (cert. denied, 66 N.J. 329, 331 A.2d 28 (1974)), the defendant was convicted for failing to stop for a red traffic signal light, under a statute almost identical with § 18.064, supr......
  • Get Started for Free