State v. County of Hudson

Citation171 N.J.Super. 453,409 A.2d 1164
PartiesSTATE of New Jersey, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, DIVISION OF PUBLIC WELFARE, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. COUNTY OF HUDSON, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES, Board of Chosen Freeholders, County of Hudson, Edwark Clark, County Executive; William Jones, Director, Hudson County Department of Health and Social Services; James Young, Chief, Division of Welfare, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Decision Date20 June 1979
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court – Appellate Division

Charles M. Schimenti, First Asst. County Counsel, Jersey City, for defendants-appellants (Harold Krieger, County Counsel, attorney; Martin L. Bearg, Asst. County Counsel, Jersey City, on the brief).

Richard M. Hluchan, Deputy Atty. Gen., for plaintiff-respondent (John J. Degnan, Atty. Gen., attorney; Stephen Skillman, Asst. Atty. Gen., of counsel).

Before Judges ALLCORN, SEIDMAN and BOTTER.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Chancery Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Kentz in his letter opinion of June 15, 1978, 161 N.J.Super. 20, 390 A.2d 720 (Ch.Div.1978). See County of Hudson, et al. v. State of New Jersey, Department of Human Services, et al., A-1295-77, decided by the Appellate Division on March 6, 1979, certif. den. 81 N.J. 268, 405 A.2d 813 (1979).

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Division of Youth and Family Services v. P.M.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court
    • February 25, 1997
    ...N.J. 303, 317, 125 A.2d 865 (1956); State v. County of Hudson, 161 N.J.Super. 29, 51, 390 A.2d 720 (Ch.Div.1978), aff'd 171 N.J.Super. 453, 409 A.2d 1164 (App.Div.1979). The courts are required to construe together all existing statutes on the same subject matter as "a unitary and harmoniou......
  • McCabe, Application of
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • January 7, 1980
    ... ... time within one year after any law or joint resolution has been filed with the Secretary of State pursuant to sections 1:2-5, 1:2-6 or 1:2-7 of this Title, the Governor has reason to believe that ... IV, § 6, par. 1. Special laws regulating the internal affairs of a municipality or county require a local petition before legislative passage. N.J.Const. (1947) art. IV, § 7, par. 10 ... ...
  • Gauer v. Essex County Div. of Welfare
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • July 27, 1987
    ...the Optional County Charter Law, State v. County of Hudson, 161 N.J.Super. 29, 43, 390 A.2d 720 (Ch.Div.1978), aff'd, 171 N.J.Super. 453, 409 A.2d 1164 (App.Div.1979). This includes the power to restructure county governments, N.J.S.A. 40:41A-30; Shapiro v. Essex County, 177 N.J.Super. 87, ......
  • Weiner v. County of Essex
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court
    • July 10, 1992
    ...N.J.S.A. 40:41A-30. Thus, in State v. Hudson Cty., 161 N.J.Super. 29, 48-52, 390 A.2d 720 (Ch.Div.1978), aff'd, 171 N.J.Super. 453, 409 A.2d 1164 (App.Div.1979), the court ruled that a county which abolished its welfare board and assumed direct administration of the welfare program under th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT