State v. Crider

Docket NumberDA 12-0487
Decision Date28 May 2014

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
34 cases
  • State v. Favel
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • December 2, 2015
    ...court provided a definitive ruling. See, e.g., Anderson v. BNSF Ry., 2015 MT 240, 380 Mont. 319, 354 P.3d 1248 ; State v. Crider, 2014 MT 139, 375 Mont. 187, 328 P.3d 612 ; Peterson–Tuell v. First Student Transp., LLC, 2014 MT 307, 377 Mont. 113, 339 P.3d 16 ; State v. Vukasin, 2003 MT 230,......
  • State v. Oldson
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • June 10, 2016
    ...§ 5233 (2014).12 1 Imwinkelried, supra note 11 at 105.13 See, State v. Torres, 283 Neb. 142, 812 N.W.2d 213 (2012) ; State v. Crider, 375 Mont. 187, 328 P.3d 612 (2014) ; State v. Marshall, 312 Or. 367, 823 P.2d 961 (1991) ; State v. Hedger, 115 Idaho 598, 768 P.2d 1331 (1989) ; David P. Le......
  • Anderson v. BNSF Ry.
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • August 12, 2015
    ...objection in the presence of the jury for tactical reasons, yet may wish to preserve the objection on appeal.” State v. Crider, 2014 MT 139, ¶ 19, 375 Mont. 187, 328 P.3d 612 (quoting Ingraham, ¶ 36). A party raising an objection through a motion in limine “need not continually renew the ob......
  • State v. Rowe
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • February 27, 2024
    ...is directed to the relevance and admissibility of such evidence and thus reviewed for an abuse of discretion. State v. Crider, 2014 MT 139, ¶ 14, 375 Mont. 187, 328 P.3d 612. An abuse of discretion occurs when a district court acts arbitrarily without conscientious judgment, or exceeds the ......
  • Get Started for Free