State v. Croom

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Florida
Writing for the CourtHOCKER, J. (after stating the facts).
Citation48 Fla. 176,37 So. 303
Decision Date22 July 1904
PartiesSTATE ex rel. GUYTON, Circuit Court Clerk v. CROOM, State Comptroller.

37 So. 303

48 Fla. 176

STATE ex rel. GUYTON, Circuit Court Clerk
v.

CROOM, State Comptroller.

Florida Supreme Court

July 22, 1904


In Banc. Petition by the state, on the relation of Moses Guyton, clerk of the circuit court of Jackson county, for writ of mandamus to A. C. Croom, State Comptroller.

Syllabus by the Court

SYLLABUS

1. Under the provisions of chapter 4121, p. 45, Laws 1893, a clerk of a circuit court is a proper party, as relator in a mandamus proceeding, to require the Comptroller to honor a requisition by such clerk for the amount of money necessary for the payment of jurors and witnesses to be paid by the state at any regular or special term of the circuit court.

2. Section 9, art. 16, of the Constitution, as amended in 1894, does not impose upon the several counties of the state the duty of paying the per diem and mileage of witnesses before a grand jury.

3. The phrase 'witnesses duly summoned by the state,' which is contained in section 2, c. 4120, p. 45, Laws 1893, construed in connection with section 1, c. 4119, p. 44, Laws 1893, and in connection with section 2, c. 5114, p. 35, Laws 1903 (the latter appropriating $70,000 for the payment of jurors and witnesses before the grand juries for the year 1904), embraces witnesses before grand juries, and imposes upon the state the duty of paying the per diem and mileage of such witnesses.

4. There is no conflict between section 24, art. 4, of the Constitution of 1885, and chapter 4121, p. 45, Laws 1893; and when a requisition is made by a clerk on the Comptroller for the money to pay jurors and witnesses to be paid by the state, as provided in said chapter 4121, and the amount deemed by him necessary is indorsed on said requisition, and this indorsement is countersigned by the Governor, as required by said section 24, art. 4, of the Constitution, such requisition, so indorsed and countersigned, becomes an order on the Treasurer, within the meaning of the word 'order' as used in said section of the Constitution, and as authority for the Treasurer to transmit the money to a clerk, as required by said chapter 4121.

COUNSEL [37 So. 305]

[48 Fla. 182] Wm. B. Farley, for plaintiff.

W. H. Ellis, Atty. Gen., for respondent. [48 Fla. 177] On the petition of the relator, Moses Guyton, clerk of the circuit court of Jackson county, Fla., presented to this court, an alternative writ was issued in the following form:

'In the Supreme Court of the State of Florida. 'In the Name of the State of Florida

'To A. C. Croom, as Comptroller of the State of Florida--Greeting:

'Whereas, the sworn petition of Moses Guyton, clerk of the circuit court of Jackson county, Florida, filed before this honorable court on the 7th day of July, A. D. 1904, shows as follows: That petitioner is clerk of the circuit court in and for the county of Jackson, state of Florida, and that said circuit court is in session, Spring term, 1904. That within four weeks of the commencement of said Spring term of said court in and for Jackson county, state of Florida, petitioner, as clerk of the circuit court of said county, did make an estimate of the amount necessary for the payment of jurors and witnesses before the grand jury to be paid by the state at said term of court, and in person did call upon the Honorable A. C. Croom, as Comptroller of the state of Florida, for the purpose of making a requisition and obtaining such money to the amount of such estimate; but petitioner was informed by the said A. C. Croom, as Comptroller, that petitioner's requisition, if containing a requisition for the payment of the fees of witnesses before the grand jury, would not be honored, and that petitioner would be allowed to make requisition for money to pay jurors only--the said comptroller basing such refusal upon an opinion of the late Attorney General to the effect that fees of witnesses before the grand jury should not be paid by the state, but by the county. That petitioner, knowing that the like term of court in the year A. D. 1903 [48 Fla. 178] required $1,513.75 for the payment of jurors, and $772.35 for the payment of the fees of witnesses before the grand jury, filled out an estimate and requisition blank, furnished him by said Comptroller, for the sum of $1,500 for the payment of jurors only at said present term of court, and in due process received such sum of $1,500. That the board of county commissioners for the county of Jackson, state of Florida, refuse to pay the fees of witnesses before the grand jury, or to allow the same to be paid by the county, claiming that under the statutes such fees should be paid by the state of Florida. That the compensation of jurors and witnesses before the grand jury to be paid by the state at the spring term of said circuit court in and for Jackson county, state of Florida, exceeds the amount estimated by the petitioner as clerk aforesaid, in the estimate and requisition forwarded to the Comptroller as aforesaid, and said amount is insufficient to pay in full said jurors and witnesses before the grand jury, and petitioner as such clerk did, on the 24th day of June, A. D. 1904, during said present term of the said circuit court, make his further requisition upon the said Comptroller for the amount necessary to [37 So. 304] pay such deficiency, to wit, the sum of $500, which further requisition is in the words and figures following, to wit:

"Additional for Use of Clerks of the Circuit Court Only.

"Office of the Clerk Circuit Court, Jackson County, Florida.

"June 24th, 1904.

"To the Comptroller of the State of Florida, Tallahassee, Fla.

"Sir: In accordance with the requirements of law, I estimate the amount necessary for the payment of jurors and [48 Fla. 179] witnesses who appear before the grand jury at the Spring term, 1904, of the circuit court in and for the county of Jackson, to be five hundred dollars.

"Witness my hand and official seal this 24th day of June, A. D. 1904.

"[Signed] Moses Guyton,

"Clerk of the Circuit Court for Jackson County, Florida.

"[Official Seal.]

"To the Comptroller of the State of Florida, Tallahassee, Fla.

"Sir: I hereby make requisition upon you for the sum of five hundred dollars, to pay jurors and witnesses who appear before the grand jury at the Spring term of the circuit court in and for the county of Jackson, which convenes on the 13th day of June, 1904. This requisition is made in pursuance of the laws of Florida, and, as required by law, the surplus funds, if any, and the pay rolls, will be forwarded to the Comptroller within ten days after court adjourns.

"I understand that witnesses are only to be paid for actual attendance on the grand jury, and not for any other service.

"Witness my hand and seal of office this 24th day of June, A. D. 1904.

"[Signed] Moses Guyton,

"Clerk Circuit Court, Jackson County, Fla.

"[Official Seal.]

"Instructions. Make requisitions upon the Comptroller. If funds are not...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 practice notes
  • State Ex Rel. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalizers
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • November 20, 1922
    ...24 Fla. 29, 3 So. 433; State ex rel. Willie v. Barnes, 22 Fla. 8; State ex rel. Weeks v. Gamble, 13 Fla. 9; State ex rel. Guyton v. Croom, 48 Fla. 176, 37 So. 303; State ex rel. Kittel v. Jennings, 47 Fla. 307, 35 So. 986; Woodall v. Darst, 71 W.Va. 350, 77 S.E. 264, 80 S.E. 367, 44 L. R. A......
  • State v. Hilburn
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • July 9, 1915
    ...limitation upon the legislative power, 1 think the act is valid. Cheney v. Jones, 14 Fla. 587, text 607; State ex rel. Guyton v. Croom, 48 Fla. 176, 37 So. 303; Thomas v. Williamson, 51 Fla. 332, 40 So. 831; Bloxham v. Florida Cent. & P. R. Co., 35 Fla. 625, text 734, 17 So. 902; Holton v. ......
  • Grand Jury Investigation, In re, Nos. 43644 and 43649
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • December 5, 1973
    ...system a grand jury is an appendage or adjunct to the circuit court . . .' (Emphasis supplied) Next, in State ex rel. Guyton v. Croom, 48 Fla. 176, 37 So. 303, 306 (1904), our Court '. . . under our judicial system a grand jury is an appendage or adjunct to the circuit court . . .' Then, in......
  • Mcsween v. State Live Stock Sanitary Board of Florida
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • May 9, 1929
    ...by law.' The same contention was involved and disposed of by this court adversely to this contention of complainants in State v. Croom, 48 Fla. 176, 37 So. 302, and reaffirmed in State v. Knott, 48 Fla. 188, 37 So. 307. The opinion and conclusion of the court in State v. Croom, supra, are c......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
  • State Ex Rel. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalizers
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • November 20, 1922
    ...24 Fla. 29, 3 So. 433; State ex rel. Willie v. Barnes, 22 Fla. 8; State ex rel. Weeks v. Gamble, 13 Fla. 9; State ex rel. Guyton v. Croom, 48 Fla. 176, 37 So. 303; State ex rel. Kittel v. Jennings, 47 Fla. 307, 35 So. 986; Woodall v. Darst, 71 W.Va. 350, 77 S.E. 264, 80 S.E. 367, 44 L. R. A......
  • State v. Hilburn
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • July 9, 1915
    ...limitation upon the legislative power, 1 think the act is valid. Cheney v. Jones, 14 Fla. 587, text 607; State ex rel. Guyton v. Croom, 48 Fla. 176, 37 So. 303; Thomas v. Williamson, 51 Fla. 332, 40 So. 831; Bloxham v. Florida Cent. & P. R. Co., 35 Fla. 625, text 734, 17 So. 902; Holton v. ......
  • Grand Jury Investigation, In re, Nos. 43644 and 43649
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • December 5, 1973
    ...system a grand jury is an appendage or adjunct to the circuit court . . .' (Emphasis supplied) Next, in State ex rel. Guyton v. Croom, 48 Fla. 176, 37 So. 303, 306 (1904), our Court '. . . under our judicial system a grand jury is an appendage or adjunct to the circuit court . . .' Then, in......
  • Mcsween v. State Live Stock Sanitary Board of Florida
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • May 9, 1929
    ...by law.' The same contention was involved and disposed of by this court adversely to this contention of complainants in State v. Croom, 48 Fla. 176, 37 So. 302, and reaffirmed in State v. Knott, 48 Fla. 188, 37 So. 307. The opinion and conclusion of the court in State v. Croom, supra, are c......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT