State v. Cross
| Decision Date | 08 December 1975 |
| Citation | 75 Adv.Sh. 4133,23 Or.App. 536,543 P.2d 48 |
| Parties | STATE of Oregon, Appellant, v. Edward Donald CROSS, Respondent. |
| Court | Oregon Court of Appeals |
Donald L. Paillette, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen. and W. Michael Gillette, Sol. Gen., Salem.
Larry A. Brown, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Flinn, Lake & Brown, Eugene.
Before SCHWAB, C.J., and FOLEY and FORT, JJ.
Indicted for unlawful possession of cocaine, ORS 167.207, defendant filed a motion to suppress evidence obtained pursuant to a warrantless search of his person and clothing. Following a hearing the trial court allowed the motion, and the state appeals. ORS 138.060(3).
A police officer had been called to a local shopping area parking lot during daylight hours relating to a dispute that arose concerning damage by a vehicle to a light pole. The defendant, though not involved in the accident, was present there at the request of the driver of the involved vehicle, who was his girl friend.
While talking face-to-face with the girl and the defendant for a substantial period, the officer concluded that he smelled a light-to-medium odor of marihuana emanating from the defendant. During the conversation the defendant had removed two jackets he had been wearing, folded them and placed them upon the seat of his motorcycle. The officer told the defendant of his suspicions and the defendant told him that what he probably smelled was patchouli oil which he had previously put upon his person that day. The officer told him, 'No, I recognize both smells.' Thereafter he searched the folded jackets, finding 13 handrolled marihuana cigarettes in one of the pockets. He then searched the defendant and found in a trouser pocket a vial containing a white powder which, apparently believing it contraband, he had subjected to laboratory testing, as a result of which it was identified as cocaine and defendant was indicted for its possession. At the scene the officer advised the defendant he was going to issue a citation for possession of less than an ounce of marihuana, and they proceeded to the police station for this purpose.
The trial court found:
* * *'
The court also found, however, that
'* * * there was no evidence based upon the smell that Mr. Wilson had that there was any unburned marijuana on the person of Mr. Cross. * * *'
Since the court found that the officer did smell what as an experienced police officer trained in its observation and detection he reasonably believed to be marihuana, we think the officer had probable cause to search the jackets he had just observed the defendant take off and place on his motorcycle seat. Upon the discovery of the marihuana cigarettes he also had the right to search the defendant, and...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Slowikowski
...found to be evidence of most persuasive character."See State v. Wallace, 29 Or.App. 429, 432, 563 P.2d 1237 (1977); State v. Cross, 23 Or.App. 536, 538, 543 P.2d 48 (1975).3 See State v. Carter/Burton, 54 Or.App. 852, 636 P.2d 460 (1981); State v. Walle, 52 Or.App. 963, 630 P.2d 377 (1981).......
-
Kenner v. State
...detected the odor of marijuana after opening door of stopped car in attempt to view vehicle identification number); State v. Cross, 23 Or.App. 536, 543 P.2d 48 (1975) (where trained police officer, during investigation of accident at which defendant was present but not involved, smelled odo......
-
State v. Campbell
...cause to enter the motel room and search the defendant. State v. Wallace, 29 Or.App. 429, 563 P.2d 1237 (1977), State v. Cross, 23 Or.App. 536, 543 P.2d 48 (1975). A search of the entire apartment would have also been To justify a non-consensual warrantless search, there must be probable ca......
-
Edmond v. State
...incident to arrest where officer smelled marijuana on defendant's clothing and coming from his car), cert. denied; State v. Cross, 23 Or.App. 536, 543 P.2d 48, 49–50 (1975) (when officer smelled marijuana emanating from defendant's clothing, he had probable cause to arrest defendant and sea......