State v. Crowley
| Decision Date | 22 April 1987 |
| Docket Number | No. 860341,860341 |
| Citation | State v. Crowley, 737 P.2d 198 (Utah 1987) |
| Parties | STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Edison CROWLEY, Defendant and Appellant. |
| Court | Utah Supreme Court |
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
The record before us indicates that defendant was convicted of rape, a first degree felony. On March 17, 1986, defendant filed a motion to arrest judgment or to enter judgment on reduced charges. On May 12, he filed an amended motion for a new trial. An unsigned minute entry was filed on June 10, 1986, granting defendant an additional thirty days to appear at the Utah County jail for transportation to the Utah State Prison. No judgment or sentence appears of record.
An unsigned minute entry does not constitute a final order for purposes of appeal. R. Utah S.Ct. 3(a); South Salt Lake v. Burton, 718...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
8 cases
-
Ron Shepherd Ins. Inc. v. Shields
...nor is it a final judgment for purposes of [appeal]." Wilson v. Manning, 645 P.2d 655, 655 (Utah 1982); accord State v. Crowley, 737 P.2d 198, 198-99 (Utah 1987); South Salt Lake v. Burton, 718 P.2d 405, 406 (Utah 1986); Steadman v. Lake Hills, 20 Utah 2d 61, 63, 433 P.2d 1, 3 (1967); Hartf......
-
State v. Todd
...entered is ineffective and a new appeal has to be filed within thirty days after the entry of the formal order"); State v. Crowley, 737 P.2d 198, 198 (Utah 1987) (per curiam) (stating that "[a]n unsigned minute entry does not constitute a final order for purposes of appeal"); Wilson v. Mann......
-
Black v. Tadahara, 2009 UT App 183 (Utah App. 7/2/2009), Case No. 20090334-CA.
...appealable order. See, e.g., Utah State Tax Comm. v. Erekson, 714 P.2d 1151 (Utah 1986) (per curiam); see also State v. Crowley, 737 P.2d 198, 198 (Utah 1987) (per curiam) ("An unsigned minute entry does not constitute a final order for purposes of appeal."). Similarly, an oral ruling is no......
-
State v. Bosley, Case No. 20030482-CA.
...does not constitute a final order for Page 2 purposes of appeal." State v. Jiminez, 938 P.2d 264, 265 (Utah 1997); State v. Crowley, 737 P.2d 198 (Utah 1987) (per curiam). Therefore, no final order exists from which to appeal and this court lacks jurisdiction to consider the appeal. See Uta......
Get Started for Free