State v. Cuthrell

Decision Date21 February 1984
Docket NumberNo. 832SC838,832SC838
Citation66 N.C.App. 706,311 S.E.2d 699
CourtNorth Carolina Court of Appeals
PartiesSTATE of North Carolina v. Ronald Lewis CUTHRELL. STATE of North Carolina v. William Ernest CUTHRELL.

Atty. Gen. Rufus L. Edmisten by Associate Atty. Gen. Barbara Peters Riley, Raleigh, for the State.

Gaskins, McMullan & Gaskins, P.A. by Herman E. Gaskins, Jr., Washington, for defendants-appellants.

HILL, Judge.

The sole question before the court is whether the trial court committed prejudicial and reversible error in overruling and denying the defendants' motions to dismiss based on former jeopardy.We conclude no error was committed and affirm the decision of the trial judge.

Defendants contend that the testimony of Officer Robbins was given in bad faith or undertaken to harass or prejudice the defendants, and as such constitutes an exception to the rule that a defendant's motion for or consent to a mistrial removes any double jeopardy bar to reprosecution.SeeLee v. United States, 432 U.S. 23, 97 S.Ct. 2141, 53 L.Ed.2d 80(1977).We disagree.The record reveals no misconduct by the judge or the prosecutor to provoke defendants' motion for mistrial.Officer Robbins answered the question of defense counsel properly, but then proceeded to testify to an altogether immaterial and irrelevant matter.The trial judge promptly sustained defendants' objection and instructed the jury not to consider that portion of the answer.In granting defendants' motion for a new trial, the trial judge found as a fact that the testimony was not intentional on the part of the State's witness.The trial judge had an opportunity to observe the witness through the trial and found his demeanor free of bad faith."[W]here circumstances develop not attributable to prosecutorial or judicial...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
1 cases
  • State v. White
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • April 7, 1987
    ...485, 91 S.Ct. 547, 557, 27 L.Ed.2d 543, 556 (1971); see also State v. Crocker, 239 N.C. 446, 80 S.E.2d 243 (1954); State v. Cuthrell, 66 N.C.App. 706, 311 S.E.2d 699 (1984). An exception to this rule exists for certain cases in which the defendant's motion is prompted by serious misconduct ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT