State v. Daues
Decision Date | 31 December 1926 |
Docket Number | No. 27457.,27457. |
Parties | STATE et rel. PEVELY DAIRY CO. v. DAUES et al, Judges. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
W. E. Moser and john S. Marsalek, both of St. Louis, for relator.
Mark D. Eagleton, Everett Hullverson, and Harry S. Rooks, all of St. Louis, for respondents.
This is an original proceeding in certiorari wherein relator seeks to quash a judgment and an opinion of the St. Louis Court of Appeals because of an alleged conflict with decisions of this court. The cause in which the record is brought here for review was an appeal from the circuit court of the city of St. Louis, entitled: Oscar Williams, Respondent, v. Pevely Dairy Company, a Corporation, Appellant. The opinion of the Court of Appeals disposing of the appeal follows (285 S. W. 149):
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Weaver v. Mobile & Ohio Railroad Co., 32140.
......Chicago, R.I. & P. Ry. Co., 61 S.W. (2d) 336; Gray v. Columbia Terminals Co., 52 S.W. (2d) 809; Karte v. Brockman Mfg. Co., 247 S.W. 417; State ex rel. v. Ellison, 270 Mo. 645, 195 S.W. 722; Mansur-Tebbetts Implement Co. v. Ritchie, 143 Mo. 587, 613, 45 S.W. 641. (4) Instruction M, requested ...Wolfe v. Payne, 294 Mo. 186, affd. 263 U.S. 239; State ex rel. v. Daues, 289 S.W. 835; Rigg v. Chicago, B. & Q. Ry. Co., 212 S.W. 878; Williams v. Peavely Dairy Co., 285 S.W. 149; Gibler v. Railroad Co., 129 Mo. App. 101; ......
-
Hulsey v. Quarry & Construction Co.
...... ordinary care and was guilty of negligence." This court has repeatedly and uniformly ruled that a finding that defendant, under a hypothesized state of facts, therein failed to exercise ordinary care, and was guilty of negligence, is equivalent to a finding that defendant knew, or by the exercise ......
-
Hulsey v. Tower Grove Quarry & Construction Co.
...... This court has repeatedly and uniformly ruled that a finding. that defendant, under a hypothesized state of facts, therein. failed to exercise ordinary care, and was guilty of. negligence, is equivalent to a finding that defendant knew,. or by the ......
-
Weaver v. Mobile & O. R. Co.
......I. & P. Ry. Co., 61 S.W.2d 336; Gray v. Columbia Terminals. Co., 52 S.W.2d 809; Karte v. Brockman Mfg. Co., . 247 S.W. 417; State ex rel. v. Ellison, 270 Mo. 645,. 195 S.W. 722; Mansur-Tebbetts Implement Co. v. Ritchie, 143 Mo. 587, 613, 45 S.W. 641. (4) Instruction. M, ... ground for complaint on defendant's part. Wolfe v. Payne, 294 Mo. 186, affd. 263 U.S. 239; State ex. rel. v. Daues, 289 S.W. 835; Rigg v. Chicago, B. & Q. Ry. Co., 212 S.W. 878; Williams v. Peavely Dairy. Co., 285 S.W. 149; Gibler v. Railroad Co., 129. ......