State v. Davis, (CC 074242MI; CA A137633

Citation295 P.3d 617,353 Or. 166
Decision Date10 January 2013
Docket Number(CC 074242MI; CA A137633,SC S059147).
PartiesSTATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review, v. Buck Wade DAVIS, Petitioner on Review.
CourtSupreme Court of Oregon

353 Or. 166
295 P.3d 617

STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review,
v.
Buck Wade DAVIS, Petitioner on Review.

(CC 074242MI; CA A137633; SC S059147).

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted Sept. 19, 2011.
Decided Jan. 10, 2013.


On review from the Court of Appeals.*
Kenneth A. Kreuscher, Portland Law Collective, LLP, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner on review.
With him on the brief was Travis Eiva.

Doug M. Petrina, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent on review. With him on the brief were John R. Kroger, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.


Kendra M. Matthews, Ransom Blackman LLP, Portland, filed the brief for amicus curiae ACLU Foundation of Oregon, Inc.

Before BALMER, Chief Justice, KISTLER, WALTERS, and LINDER, Justices, and DURHAM and De MUNIZ, Senior Judges, Justices pro tempore. **

The decision of the Court of Appeals and the judgment of the circuit court are affirmed by an equally divided court.


--------

Notes:

* Appeal from Jackson County Circuit Court, Ron D. Grensky, Judge. 237 Or.App. 351, 239 P.3d 1002 (2010).

**Landau, Brewer, and Baldwin, JJ., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • State v. Barnthouse
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals
    • May 20, 2015
  • State v. Hemenway
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • January 10, 2013
  • State v. Adame
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals
    • February 12, 2014
    ... ... Martin, 221 Or.App. 78, 81, 188 P.3d 432,rev. den.,345 Or. 418, 198 P.3d 942 (2008) (internal quotation marks omitted). In State v. Davis, 237 Or.App. 351, 360, 239 P.3d 1002 (2010), aff'd by an equally divided court,353 Or. 166, 295 P.3d 617 (2013), the lead opinion concluded that, even though the officer testified that he was not aware of a policy or standard on how to conduct random license plate searches, the officer's other ... ...
  • State v. Cruz, C111731CR; A150146.
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals
    • April 24, 2013
    ...Judge, and Sercombe, Judge, and Hadlock, Judge.PER CURIAM. Affirmed. State v. Davis, 237 Or.App. 351, 239 P.3d 1002 (2010), aff'd,353 Or. 166, 295 P.3d 617...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT