State v. Dawson, 660

Decision Date30 November 1966
Docket NumberNo. 660,660
Citation268 N.C. 603,151 S.E.2d 203
PartiesSTATE, v. Alex Douglas DAWSON.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Atty. Gen. T. W. Bruton and Deputy Atty. Gen. H. W. McGalliard, for the State.

Herbert H. Thorp, Fayetteville, for defendant appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant having entered said pleas of guilty, his appeal presents for review only whether error appears on the face of the record proper. State v. Darnell, 266 N.C. 640, 146 S.E.2d 800. The record on appeal contains one assignment of error, namely, that '(t)he sentences imposed by the court were excessive.' The assignment is without merit. The sentence in $21,728 is authorized by G.S. § 14--22; and the sentence in $21,727 is authorized by G.S. § 14--54. The court's authority to provide that such sentences shall run consecutively is well established. 1 Strong, N.C.Index, Criminal Law § 133. No error appearing, the judgments of the court below are affirmed.

It is noteworthy that the evidence presented to the presiding judge prior to pronouncement of said judgments was sufficient to support convictions of defendant for the capital felonies charged in the indictments. The impression prevails that defendant was well and ably represented by his court-appointed counsel.

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • State v. Martin
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • June 13, 1973
    ...by statute, and the court's authority to provide that such sentences shall run consecutively is well established. State v. Dawson, 268 N.C. 603, 151 S.E.2d 203 (1966). Such punishment is not cruel and unusual in a constitutional sense. State v. Cleaves, 4 N.C.App. 506, 166 S.E.2d 861 Also, ......
  • State v. Cleaves, 6926SC108
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • April 30, 1969
    ...G.S. § 14--107. The court's authority to provide that such sentences shall run consecutively is also well established. State v. Dawson, 268 N.C. 603, 151 S.E.2d 203. No error appears upon the face of this record; the punishment was within limits permitted by law. We No error. MALLARD, C.J.,......
  • State v. Tinsley, 75
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • October 13, 1971
    ...the only question of law or legal inference presented is whether error of law appears upon the face of the record proper. State v. Dawson, 268 N.C. 603, 151 S.E.2d 203; Strong's North Carolina Index, 2d, Vol. 3, Criminal Law, XII. Appeal and Error, § 146, p. Careful review shows a valid ind......
  • State v. Roberts
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • October 13, 1971
    ...defendant's plea was understandingly and voluntarily made; and the sentence imposed is within the statutory limits. See State v. Dawson, 268 N.C. 603, 151 S.E.2d 203; State v. Darnell, 266 N.C. 640, 146 S.E.2d This case is just one more example of the manner in which the unlimited right of ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT