State v. Dickerson, 88-K-1873

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
Citation533 So.2d 353
Docket NumberNo. 88-K-1873,88-K-1873
PartiesSTATE of Louisiana v. Johnny DICKERSON. 533 So.2d 353
Decision Date28 November 1988

Page 353

533 So.2d 353
STATE of Louisiana
v.
Johnny DICKERSON.
No. 88-K-1873.
533 So.2d 353
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Nov. 28, 1988.

In re Dickerson, Johnny; applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. KA88 0050; Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. "F", No. 53676.

Prior report: La.App., 529 So.2d 434.

Denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 practice notes
  • State v. G.R.H., No. 08-1549 (La. App. 6/3/2009), 08-1549.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana (US)
    • June 3, 2009
    ...actual and substantial prejudice in presenting his defense. State v. Dickerson, 529 So.2d 434, 439 (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 533 So.2d 353 (La.1988). See also United States v. Lovasco, 431 U.S. 783, 795 n. 17, 97 S.Ct. 2044, 2051 n. 17, 52 L.Ed.2d 752 (1977); Marion, 404 U.S. at 324,......
  • State v. Vail, 17–354
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana (US)
    • December 28, 2017
    ...actual and substantial prejudice in presenting his defense. State v. Dickerson , 529 So.2d 434, 439 (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied , 533 So.2d 353 (La.1988). See also United States v. Lovasco , 431 U.S. 783, 795 n. 17, 97 S.Ct. 2044, 2051 n. 17, 52 L.Ed.2d 752 (1977) ; Marion , 404 U.S. at......
  • Spratt v. Vannoy, CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-9115 SECTION "F"(4)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Louisiana)
    • June 4, 2021
    ...Court denied his related application for writ of review. Id. (citing State v. Dickerson, 529 So.2d 434 (La. App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 533 So.2d 353 (La. 1988)). Dickerson thereafter filed his 1989 federal habeas petition which included inter alia his claim that the state violated his due......
  • State v. Davis, 20790-KA
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana (US)
    • August 23, 1989
    ...new trial will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion. State v. Dickerson, 529 So.2d 434 (La.App. 1st Cir.1988), writ denied 533 So.2d 353 The newly discovered whereabouts of Mr. Talton do not constitute "newly discovered evidence." Furthermore, even if it were, it is highly un......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • State v. G.R.H., No. 08-1549 (La. App. 6/3/2009), No. 08-1549.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana (US)
    • June 3, 2009
    ...actual and substantial prejudice in presenting his defense. State v. Dickerson, 529 So.2d 434, 439 (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 533 So.2d 353 (La.1988). See also United States v. Lovasco, 431 U.S. 783, 795 n. 17, 97 S.Ct. 2044, 2051 n. 17, 52 L.Ed.2d 752 (1977); Marion, 404 U.S. at 324,......
  • State v. Vail, 17–354
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana (US)
    • December 28, 2017
    ...actual and substantial prejudice in presenting his defense. State v. Dickerson , 529 So.2d 434, 439 (La.App. 1st Cir.), writ denied , 533 So.2d 353 (La.1988). See also United States v. Lovasco , 431 U.S. 783, 795 n. 17, 97 S.Ct. 2044, 2051 n. 17, 52 L.Ed.2d 752 (1977) ; Marion , 404 U.S. at......
  • Spratt v. Vannoy, CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-9115 SECTION "F"(4)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Louisiana)
    • June 4, 2021
    ...Court denied his related application for writ of review. Id. (citing State v. Dickerson, 529 So.2d 434 (La. App. 1st Cir.), writ denied, 533 So.2d 353 (La. 1988)). Dickerson thereafter filed his 1989 federal habeas petition which included inter alia his claim that the state violated his due......
  • State v. Davis, No. 20790-KA
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana (US)
    • August 23, 1989
    ...new trial will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of discretion. State v. Dickerson, 529 So.2d 434 (La.App. 1st Cir.1988), writ denied 533 So.2d 353 The newly discovered whereabouts of Mr. Talton do not constitute "newly discovered evidence." Furthermore, even if it were, it is highly un......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT