State v. Dillard, No. 26008.
| Court | Court of Appeal of Missouri (US) |
| Writing for the Court | Jeffrey W. Bates |
| Citation | 158 S.W.3d 291 |
| Parties | STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. James W. DILLARD, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Docket Number | No. 26008. |
| Decision Date | 22 March 2005 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 practice notes
-
State v. Lloyd, No. 26737.
...trial court to enter an amended written judgment reflecting that Defendant was found to be a persistent offender. See State v. Dillard, 158 S.W.3d 291, 305 GARRISON and BARNEY, JJ., concur. --------------- Notes: 1. All references to statutes are to RSMo (2000). All references to rules are ......
-
State v. Eoff, No. 26047.
...we consider the facts and all reasonable inferences derived therefrom in a light most favorable to the verdict. State v. Dillard, 158 S.W.3d 291, 294 (Mo.App.2005). We disregard all contrary evidence and inferences. State v. Lawrence, 64 S.W.3d 346, 348-49 (Mo.App. 2002). Viewed from that p......
-
State v. Fortner, No. ED 100156.
...“We consider the evidence presented at the pretrial hearing, as well as any additional evidence presented at trial.” State v. Dillard, 158 S.W.3d 291, 297 (Mo.App.S.D.2005). The evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the trial court's ruling. Id. We defer to the trial court's fac......
-
State v. Deason, No. 28028.
...derived therefrom in a light most favorable to the verdict. State v. Woodmansee, 203 S.W.3d 287, 289 (Mo.App.2006); State v. Dillard, 158 S.W.3d 291, 294 (Mo.App.2005). All contrary evidence and inferences are disregarded. State v. Lawrence, 64 S.W.3d 346, 348-49 (Mo.App.2002). Viewed from ......
Request a trial to view additional results
16 cases
-
State v. Lloyd, No. 26737.
...trial court to enter an amended written judgment reflecting that Defendant was found to be a persistent offender. See State v. Dillard, 158 S.W.3d 291, 305 GARRISON and BARNEY, JJ., concur. --------------- Notes: 1. All references to statutes are to RSMo (2000). All references to rules are ......
-
State v. Eoff, No. 26047.
...we consider the facts and all reasonable inferences derived therefrom in a light most favorable to the verdict. State v. Dillard, 158 S.W.3d 291, 294 (Mo.App.2005). We disregard all contrary evidence and inferences. State v. Lawrence, 64 S.W.3d 346, 348-49 (Mo.App. 2002). Viewed from that p......
-
State v. Fortner, No. ED 100156.
...“We consider the evidence presented at the pretrial hearing, as well as any additional evidence presented at trial.” State v. Dillard, 158 S.W.3d 291, 297 (Mo.App.S.D.2005). The evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the trial court's ruling. Id. We defer to the trial court's fac......
-
State v. Deason, No. 28028.
...derived therefrom in a light most favorable to the verdict. State v. Woodmansee, 203 S.W.3d 287, 289 (Mo.App.2006); State v. Dillard, 158 S.W.3d 291, 294 (Mo.App.2005). All contrary evidence and inferences are disregarded. State v. Lawrence, 64 S.W.3d 346, 348-49 (Mo.App.2002). Viewed from ......
Request a trial to view additional results