State v. Doster-Northington Drug Co.
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | THOMAS, J. |
| Citation | State v. Doster-Northington Drug Co., 196 Ala. 447, 71 So. 427 (Ala. 1916) |
| Decision Date | 10 February 1916 |
| Docket Number | 6 Div. 255 |
| Parties | STATE v. DOSTER-NORTHINGTON DRUG CO. |
Rehearing Denied March 30, 1916
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jefferson County; C.B. Smith, Judge.
Action by the State of Alabama against the Doster-Northington Drug Company. From an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
W.L Martin, Atty. Gen., and J.P. Mudd, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.
E.J Smyer and Charles E. Rice, both of Birmingham, for appellee.
The appellee, a corporation conducting its business in Jefferson county, Ala., was assessed by the county tax commissioner of said county on its escape solvent credits and credits of value, for the tax years running from October 1, 1908, to September 30, 1912, inclusive, to the amount of $10,000, and for the year beginning October 1, 1913, to the amount of $20,000.
This aggregate assessed value, for these years, of $70,000, was fixed on August 5, 1914, in pursuance of the provisions of section 2260 of the Code of 1907, by the county tax commissioners, and was agreed to by the taxpayer, appellee and said assessment was thereafter filed by the county tax commissioner with the tax collector of Jefferson county for collection.
On November 3, 1914, the state tax commission disregarded this assessment made and returned to the tax collector, and made a revaluation and reassessment of the same "solvent credits and credits of value" of appellee, for each of said years, fixing the excape value for each year at $25,000. In pursuance of such reassessment the state tax commission issued notice to said appellee company to appear before said commission on December 7, 1914, to show cause why the assessment should not be enforced, as on the valuation so fixed by that body.
By its attorney the Doster-Northington Drug Company, on December 7, 1914, made a special appearance before the state tax commission, and moved for the dismissal of the cause on the ground that the tax year in which the assessment was made by the county tax commissioner had expired on the 30th day of September, 1914, that the assessment became final on October 1, 1914, and that the state tax commission had no jurisdiction, power, or authority, after the expiration of the tax year (on November 3, 1914) to set aside and hold for naught the assessment made by the county tax commissioner. On December 28, 1914, the state tax commission overruled appellee's motion, and entered an assessment against it of $15,000 a year for each of said years, on its solvent credits and credits of value, making an aggregate valuation for said years of $90,000.
Appellee thereupon filed bond and appealed to the circuit court of Jefferson county, where the state filed a complaint containing two counts, setting up the facts in substance as we have stated them. In the second count of the complaint, in addition to the stated facts, there were allegations on the part of the state, by which it sought to raise appellee's assessed value over the amount so assessed by the state tax commission, to the extent of $5,000, or to the total sum of $95,000 for the years in question, whereas the total assessed valuation by the state tax commission, for such period, was $90,000.
Defendant demurred to each count of the complaint, and assigned as grounds, in substance, that the assessment made by the county tax commissioner became final on the 1st day of October, 1914, and that thereafter, and on November 3, 1914, the state tax commission had no jurisdiction or power to set aside the assessment made by the county tax commissioner, and reassess or revalue the property. The court sustained the demurrer. The state excepted, and takes this appeal.
This court has held that the tax year commenced on October 1st and ended with September 30th. Frost v. State, 153 Ala. 654, 45 So. 203; Hooper v. State, 141 Ala. 111, 37 So. 662. There are many statutes that fix this demarcation of the tax year. Taxes are declared to be due and payable on the 1st day of October of each year (Code, § 2091; Acts 1915, p. 392, § 8, page 399, § 18); and all property brought into the state after the 1st day of October, and before the assessor has completed his assessment, is subject to taxation, the same as if it had been held or owned in the state on the 1st day of October (Code, § 2092); the lien of state and county, for taxes, is fixed from and after the 1st day of October (Code, § 2093); and the tax assessments must commence on the 1st day of October in every year (Code, § 2102). When the Constitution required the payment of poll tax for the year 1901, before February 1st, it referred to the tax year as fixed by the statute of 1900-01--this poll tax having become fixed on October 1, 1900, and due on October 1st, succeeding. Const. § 178.
If the state through its duly constituted officers has exercised the final power of assessment and valuation of property, the determination is in its nature judicial (State Tax. Comm. v. Bailey et al., 179 Ala. 620, 627, 60 So. 913; Orr v. State, 3 Idaho [Hasb.] 190, 28 P. 416); and unless impeached for fraud or lack of jurisdiction, or reviewed by appellate authority, it is final (Anniston City Land. Co. v. State, 185 Ala. 482, 487, 64 So. 110; 37 Cyc. 1071).
The authority to make the assessment for escaped taxes was expressly conferred on the county tax commissioner by section 2260 of the Code of 1907; and it was his duty to assess, for "any preceding year not more than five years before that time," and to forthwith deliver the assessment to the clerk of the court of county commissioners, or other court of like jurisdiction, for hearing the taxpayer, unless the taxpayer, upon being notified by the tax commissioner that he had made such...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Baker v. Paxton
... ... The ... period for assessment had expired at the time the state board ... ordered the increase in valuations complained of; (2794-2798 ... C. S.) and other ... affected to his prejudice. This is in line with the holding ... in State v. Doster-Northington Drug Co., 196 Ala ... 447, 71 So. [29 Wyo. 517] 427, the only case which we have ... found in ... ...
-
State Tax Commission v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & R. Co.
...for at no period during the tax year could the taxpayer feel secure as to a settlement of the question of his taxation. In State v. Doster-Northington Drug Co., supra, this court under review the power of the State Tax Commission to set aside an assessment of a taxpayer and to revalue and r......
-
In re Opinions of the Justices
... ... The ... statute exempting homesteads from state ad valorem taxes, ... construed as applying to taxes for the year 1936-37, does not ... violate ... of Review as to such escaped taxes. State v ... Doster-Northington Drug Co., 196 Ala. 447, 71 So. 427 ... Adverting ... to later provisions of the Revenue ... ...
-
Fuqua v. Spry Burial Ins. Co.
...Crane Co., 18 Ala.App. 194, 89 So. 901, certiorari denied Ex parte State ex rel. Davis, 206 Ala. 701, 90 So. 926; State v. Doster-Northington Drug Co., 196 Ala. 447, 71 So. 427; Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railway Co. v. Board of Education, 5 Cir., 80 F.2d 307; State v. Neuhoff, 239 Ala. 584, ......