State v. Edelman, (SC 16623)
| Decision Date | 18 February 2003 |
| Docket Number | (SC 16623) |
| Citation | 815 A.2d 104,262 Conn. 392 |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. STEVEN EDELMAN |
Sullivan, C. J., Borden, Katz, Palmer and Vertefeuille, Js.
David K. Jaffe, for the appellant (defendant).
Denise B. Smoker, assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were Patricia M. Froehlich, state's attorney, Keith Currier, deputy assistant state's attorney, and Lonnie Braxton, assistant state's attorney, for the appellee (state).
The defendant, Steven Edelman, appeals, following our grant of certification to appeal, from the judgment of the Appellate Court reversing the trial court's judgment of conviction of violating the state building code, as prohibited by General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 29-263,1 and remanding the case for a new trial. State v. Edelman, 64 Conn. App. 480, 780 A.2d 980 (2001). We granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal limited to the following issue: "Under the plain error doctrine, should the defendant's conviction be reversed and judgment directed in his favor, on the ground that there was no evidence that the defendant unlawfully continued to work under § 118.2 of the state building code?" State v. Edelman, 258 Conn. 940, 786 A.2d 427 (2001).
After examining the entire record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.
The appeal is dismissed.
1. General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 29-263 provides in relevant part: "Except as provided in subsection (h) of section 29-252a, after October 1, 1970, no building or structure shall be constructed or altered until an application has been filed with the building official and a permit issued. . . ."
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Maurice M., No. 29557.
...(Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Edelman, 64 Conn.App. 480, 485, 780 A.2d 980 (2001), appeal dismissed, 262 Conn. 392, 815 A.2d 104 (2003). Section 53-21(a) provides in relevant part that "[a]ny person who (1) wilfully or unlawfully causes or permits any child under the age of s......
-
State v. Calderon
...(Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Edelman, 64 Conn. App. 480, 485, 780 A.2d 980 (2001), appeal dismissed, 262 Conn. 392, 815 A.2d 104 (2003). On the basis of Judge Alexander's explanation of the "no contact" provision of the protective order, a person of ordinary intelligence wou......
-
Edelman v. Page
...Supreme Court initially granted certification for an appeal, then dismissed it as improvidently granted. State v. Edelman, 262 Conn. 392, 815 A.2d 104 (2003) (per curiam). The remaining charge against plaintiff for unlawfully working without a permit was ultimately dropped pursuant to an un......
-
Edelman v. David Page
...to ninety days incarceration and fined $500.” State v. Edelman, 64 Conn.App. 480, 482, 780 A.2d 980 (2001), appeal dismissed, 262 Conn. 392, 815 A.2d 104 (2003). On appeal, this court reversed the plaintiff's conviction, concluding that the denial by the trial court, Foley, J., “of the [pla......