State v. Edmonds
| Decision Date | 15 October 2014 |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE of Connecticut v. Michael EDMONDS. |
314 Conn. 925
100 A.3d 855 (Mem)
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Michael EDMONDS.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Decided Oct. 15, 2014.
Bradford Buchta, assistant public defender, and Nicole Donzello, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition.
Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
Opinion
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 151 Conn.App. 763, 96 A.3d 607, is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the record was not adequate for appellate review of the defendant's claim that he was seized when Sergeant Ronald Mercado commanded him to stop?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendant was not seized until police officers conducted a patdown search of the defendant's person?”
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Edmonds
...that the defendant was not seized until police officers conducted a patdown search of the defendant's person?" State v. Edmonds, 314 Conn. 925, 100 A.3d 855 (2014). Because the certified questions are inextricably linked with the related issue of whether the officers' seizure of the defenda......
-
State v. Edmonds
...that the defendant was not seized until police officers conducted a patdown search of the defendant's person?” State v. Edmonds, 314 Conn. 925, 100 A.3d 855 (2014). Because the certified questions are inextricably linked with the related issue of whether the officers' seizure of the defenda......