State v. Eisenstein, A--122
| Decision Date | 12 May 1952 |
| Docket Number | No. A--122,A--122 |
| Citation | 9 N.J. 347,88 A.2d 366 |
| Parties | STATE of New Jersey, plaintiff-respondent, v. Isadore EISENSTEIN, defendant-appellant. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 16 N.J.Super 8, 83 A.2d 777.
John E. Toolan, Perth Amboy, argued the cause for appellant (Toolan, Haney & Romond, Perth Amboy, attorneys).
Edward Gaulkin Newark, argued the cause for respondent (C. William Caruso, Newark, of counsel).
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Jacobs in the court below.
For affirmance: Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING and BRENNAN--6.
For reversal: None.
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
State v. White
...not empower the prosecutor to compel testimony. State v. Eisenstein, 16 N.J.Super. 8, 13, 83 A.2d 777 (App.Div.1951), affirmed 9 N.J. 347, 88 A.2d 366 (1952). Defendant also complains of the absence of a warning that he was free not to speak and that what he said might be used against him. ......
-
State v. Engels
...State v. Kowalczyk, 3 N.J. 51, 68 A.2d 835 (1949); State v. Eisenstein, 16 N.J.Super. 8, 13, 83 A.2d 777 (App.Div.1951), affirmed 9 N.J. 347, 88 A.2d 366 (1952). Vide, also, State v. Ellenstein, 121 N.J.L. 304, 324, 2 A.2d 454 (Sup.Ct.1938). The indictment for false swearing under observati......
-
State v. Goodman
...Eisenstein and Miller gave voluntary testimony. See State v. Eisenstein, 16 N.J.Super. 8, 83 A.2d 777 (App.Div.1951) affirmed 9 N.J. 347, 88 A.2d 366 (1952). The payments to Miller and his remissions to Eisenstein were not disputed but there were denials that Goodman and Powell or either of......
-
Malisse, In re, A--557
...Eisenstein, 10 N.J.Super. 497, 500, 77 A.2d 63 (Cty.Ct.1950), 16 N.J.Super. 8, 83 A.2d 777 (App.Div.1951), certification denied 9 N.J. 347, 88 A.2d 366 (1952). On January 14, 1960 (sic) Malisse was called as a witness in Russo's trial for bookmaking. He repudiated the truth of his statement......