State v. Emery

Decision Date14 June 2012
Docket NumberNo. 86033–5.,86033–5.
Citation278 P.3d 653,174 Wash.2d 741
CourtWashington Supreme Court
PartiesSTATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Anthony Marquise EMERY, Jr., Petitioner. State of Washington, Respondent, v. Aaron Edward Olson, Petitioner.
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
1572 cases
  • State v. Maddaus
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • September 20, 2013
    ...misconduct by the effect likely to have flowed from it, focusing more on whether an instruction could have cured the misconduct. Emery, 174 Wn.2d at 762. In so doing, we inquire whether the misconduct '"a feeling of prejudice'" that would have prevented a fair trial absent a curative instru......
  • State v. Rowland
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • September 25, 2018
    ... ... identified in his SAG entitles him to a new trial. Rowland ... SAG at 28. "Under the cumulative error doctrine, a ... defendant may be entitled to a new trial when cumulative ... errors produce a trial that is fundamentally unfair." ... State v. Emery , 174 Wn.2d 741, 766, 278 P.3d 653 ... (2012). As discussed above, Rowland was not affected by ... multiple errors. He is therefore not entitled to a new trial ... based on cumulative error ... We ... remand for the trial court to vacate Robinson's attempted ... ...
  • State v. Gouley
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • September 8, 2021
    ...claim, "the defendant bears the burden of proving that the prosecutor's conduct was both improper and prejudicial." State v. Emery , 174 Wash.2d 741, 756, 278 P.3d 653 (2012). We review the challenged conduct "in the context of the whole argument, the issues of the case, the evidence addres......
  • State v. Christian
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • July 6, 2021
    ...has been so prejudiced that nothing short of a new trial can ensure that the defendant will be fairly tried." State v. Emery, 174 Wash.2d 741, 765, 278 P.3d 653 (2012). "A trial court's denial of a motion for mistrial will be overturned only when there is a ‘substantial likelihood’ that the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • § 12.8 Standard of Review Applied to Specific Rulings: Criminal Cases
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Appellate Practice Deskbook (WSBA) Chapter 12 Standard of Review
    • Invalid date
    ...comments were improper and prejudicial." State v. Lindsay, 180 Wn.2d 423, 430, 326 P.3d 125 (2014); State v. Emery, 174 Wn.2d 741, 756, 278 P.3d 653 (2012). Notable exceptions to that rule are "direct constitutional claims involving prosecutors' improper arguments," Emery, 174 Wn.2d at 757 ......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • Washington State Bar Association Washington Appellate Practice Deskbook (WSBA) Table of Cases
    • Invalid date
    ...12.8(3) State v. Elmore, 154 Wn. App. 885, 228 P.3d 760, review denied, 169 Wn.2d 1018 (2010): 11.9(2) State v. Emery, 174 Wn.2d 741, 278 P.3d 653 (2012): 12.8(8) State v. Ermert, 94 Wn.2d 839, 621 P.2d 121 (1980): 11.7(9)(c) State v. Evans, 100 Wn. App. 757, 998 P.2d 373 (2000): 5.2(3) Sta......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT