State v. England
| Court | Louisiana Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | SOMMERVILLE, J. |
| Citation | State v. England, 148 La. 178, 86 So. 728 (La. 1920) |
| Decision Date | 29 November 1920 |
| Docket Number | 24244 |
| Parties | STATE v. ENGLAND et al |
Appeal from Third Judicial District Court, Parish of Claiborne; J E. Reynolds, Judge.
Walter and Fred England were convicted of robbery, and they appeal.
Judgment annulled and reversed.
Scheen & Blanchard, of Shreveport, and T. T. Land, of Homer, for appellants.
A. V Coco, Atty. Gen., and J. Rush Wimberly, Dist. Atty., of Arcadia (T. S. Walmsley of New Orleans, of counsel), for the State.
Defendants in the bill of indictment in this case were charged as follows:
"Did then and there with force and arms unlawfully, willfully, and feloniously seize, rob, take, and carry away the sum of $ 100 in money of legal currency of the United States of America from the person of E. G. Wyatt, the personal property of the said E. G. Wyatt, contrary to the form of the statute of the state of Louisiana in such case made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the same."
Defendants, after conviction, moved in arrest of judgment that the indictment under which they were tried and convicted charges and states no crime known to the laws of the state of Louisiana.
In other words, the motion is based on the omission of the words, or their equivalents, from the bill of indictment, that the taking was "by means of violence or by putting in fear," and substituting therefor the words "with force and arms." Robbery is a common-law offense, and the English common law must be resorted to for the definition of it. Indictments for robbery must set out specifically all the essential elements of the crime at common law, and the indictment in this case is defective in that it does not set out the essential elements of the crime.
Sections 809 and 810 of the Revised Statutes both refer to robbery the former has been applied to ...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
State v. Snowden
... ... and one silver watch chain) is sufficient ... Section ... 775, page 217, Criminal Law and Procedure by Hughes ... Robbery ... is a common-law crime and in an indictment for same all ... elements must be specifically set out ... State ... v. England, 86 So. 728 ... A ... defective indictment cannot be cured by intendment or ... presumptions ... Cook ... Case, 72 Miss. 519, 520, 521; Riggs v. State, 26 ... Miss. 51 ... In ... quite a number of cases this court is committed to the ... proposition that ... ...
-
State v. Howard
...from the immediate control of another and further fails to specifically state that the taking was by force or intimidation. State v. England, 148 La. 178, 86 So. 728 is cited in support of this There is no merit in the point. This court has held time and time again (see State v. Eyer, 237 L......
-
State v. Durbin
...afford good ground for arresting judgment. R.S. 15:518. The conviction and sentence are affirmed. 1 For those elements see State v. England, 148 La. 178, 86 So. 728.2 See State v. Scott, 223 La. 769, 66 So.2d 802 and authorities there ...
- Brown v. Minden Lumber Co.