State v. Ewing, CC
Decision Date | 16 October 1978 |
Docket Number | No. CC,CC |
Citation | 585 P.2d 34,36 Or.App. 573 |
Parties | STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Steven Ray EWING, Appellant. 77-677; CA 10779. |
Court | Oregon Court of Appeals |
Gary L. Hooper, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.
William F. Nessly, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were James A. Redden, Atty. Gen., and Walter L. Barrie, Sol. Gen., Salem.
Before SCHWAB, C. J., and JOHNSON, GILLETTE and ROBERTS, JJ.
Defendant, prosecuted for possession of a stolen vehicle (ORS 481.990) appeals the sentence of five years imprisonment and the order requiring him to pay $700 in restitution. We address in this opinion the sufficiency of the order requiring restitution. Defendant's other assignment of error does not warrant discussion.
In State v. Calderilla, 34 Or.App. 1007, 580 P.2d 578 (1978), we held that under ORS 161.675(1): (1) An order imposing restitution must specify the time, place and manner of payment in sufficient detail so that defendant will know when he is in default; (2) where defendant is sentenced to a term of imprisonment, the terms of payment shall not encompass the period of imprisonment unless there is an express finding that defendant has sufficient assets to pay the obligation imposed. The order here fails to meet these requirements.
The state in effect requests that we overrule Calderilla because of ORS 144.275, which provides:
The only effect of this statute is to empower the Board of Parole to establish for parolees a schedule for payment of restitution. Presumably, in such cases the Board's order may modify the schedule of payment specified in the original order of the sentencing court. The statute, however, does not...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Miller
...JJ. PER CURIAM. Reversed and remanded for resentencing. State v. Calderilla, 34 Or.App. 1007, 580 P.2d 578 (1978); State v. Ewing, 36 Or.App. 573, 585 P.2d 34 (1978). ...
-
State v. Miller
...that portion of the resentencing order imposing costs. 1 State v. Calderilla, 34 Or.App. 1007, 580 P.2d 578 (1978); State v. Ewing, 36 Or.App. 573, 585 P.2d 34 (1978). ...
-
State v. Wilson
...J., and LEE, RICHARDSON and JOSEPH, JJ. PER CURIAM. The state concedes error. Reversed and remanded for resentencing. State v. Ewing, 36 Or.App. 573, 585 P.2d 34 (1978); State v. Harvey, 35 Or.App. 719, 582 P.2d 476 (1978); State v. Calderilla, 34 Or.App. 1007, 580 P.2d 578 ...
-
State v. Freeman
...and ROBERTS, JJ. PER CURIAM. The state concedes that this cause must be reversed and remanded for resentencing. State v. Ewing, 36 Or.App. 573, 585 P.2d 34 (1978); State v. Calderilla, 34 Or.App. 1007, 580 P.2d 578 ...