State v. Faria
| Decision Date | 15 January 1998 |
| Citation | State v. Faria, 707 A.2d 1266, 243 Conn. 965 (Conn. 1998) |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE of Connecticut v. Inde FARIA. |
Paul E. Murray, Supervisory Assistant State's Attorney, in support of the petition.
Mark Rademacher, Assistant Public Defender, in opposition.
The petition of the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 47 Conn.App. 159, 703 A.2d 1149 (AC 16684), is denied.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
26 cases
-
State v. Samuels
...the result." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Faria, 47 Conn. App. 159, 175, 703 A.2d 1149 (1997), cert. denied, 243 Conn. 965, 707 A.2d 1266 (1998). The defendant claims that the court improperly permitted the victim's therapist and two of her teachers to testify because the vi......
-
Franko v. Comm'r of Corr.
...between the facts of his case and the facts of State v. Faria, 47 Conn. App. 159, 178-86, 703 A.2d 1149 (1997), cert. denied, 243 Conn. 965, 707 A.2d 1266 (1998), in which this court held that a trial court's failure to give a lesser included offense instruction on unlawful restraint in the......
-
State v. Wargo
...Nardini, 187 Conn. 513, 523, 447 A.2d 396 (1982)." State v. Faria, 47 Conn. App. 159, 175, 703 A.2d 1149 (1997), cert. denied, 243 Conn. 965, 707 A.2d 1266 (1998). "`The primary responsibility for conducting the prejudicial-probative balancing test rests with the trial court, and its conclu......
-
State v. Sanseverino
...restraint in the second degree falls within the definition of the crime of kidnapping in the first degree"), cert. denied, 243 Conn. 965, 707 A.2d 1266 (1998). In State v. Grant, 177 Conn. 140, 147, 411 A.2d 917 (1979), this court first adopted the rule that it "may order the modification o......
Get Started for Free