State v. Fauci
| Decision Date | 31 March 2005 |
| Citation | 273 Conn. 921,871 A.2d 1029 |
| Parties | STATE of Connecticut v. Michael FAUCI. |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
Robert S. Bello, Stamford, in support of the petition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 87 Conn.App. 150, 865 A.2d 1191(2005), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that: (1)the state engaged in prosecutorial misconduct; and (2)the defendant was not deprived of a fair trial as a result?"
NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
The Supreme Court...
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Start Your 7-day Trial
9 cases
-
State v. Fauci, (SC 17402) (Conn. 4/10/2007)
...state engaged in prosecutorial [impropriety]; and (2) the defendant was not deprived of a fair trial as a result?" State v. Fauci, 273 Conn. 921, 922, 871 A.2d 1029 (2005). I We first address the defendant's claims. The defendant claims that the Appellate Court properly determined that the ......
-
State v. Galarza
...of defense counsel during rebuttal. State v. Fauci, 87 Conn.App. 150, 173-76, 865 A.2d 1191, cert. granted on other grounds, 273 Conn. 921, 871 A.2d 1029 (2005). In summation, the state argued its theory: "This is a case, ladies and gentlemen, where the defendant had the motive to kill the ......
-
State v. Fauci
...state engaged in prosecutorial [impropriety]; and (2) the defendant was not deprived of a fair trial as a result?" State v. Fauci, 273 Conn. 921, 922, 871 A.2d 1029 (2005). I We first address the defendant's claims. The defendant claims that the Appellate Court properly determined that the ......
-
State v. Morales
...(Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Fauci, 87 Conn.App. 150, 163-64, 865 A.2d 1191, cert. granted on other grounds, 273 Conn. 921, 871 A.2d 1029 (2005). "Once the first step is complete and misconduct has been identified, we must apply the factors set forth in State v. Williams, [s......
Request a trial to view additional results