State v. Flores

Decision Date16 November 1982
Citation653 P.2d 960,294 Or. 77
PartiesSTATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review, v. Daniel FLORES, Petitioner on Review. TC 10-81-05891; CA A22413; SC 28913.
CourtOregon Supreme Court

Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender and Ernest E. Estes, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed petition for review on behalf of petitioner on review.

Christine L. Dickey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, filed brief in the Court of Appeals on behalf of respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen. and William F. Gary, Sol. Gen., Salem.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for review allowed. Remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of State v. Caraher, 293 Or. 741, 653 P.2d 942 (Nov. 2, 1982).

* Appeal from Circuit Court, Lane County, Edwin E. Allen, Judge. 58 Or.App. 437, 648 P.2d 1328 (1982).

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • State v. Flores
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals
    • October 30, 1984
    ...in light of Oregon constitutional principles announced in State v. Caraher, 293 Or. 741, 653 P.2d 942 (1982). State v. Flores, 294 Or. 77, 653 P.2d 960 (1982). On remand, we look not only to Caraher but also to a later decision, State v. Lowry, 295 Or. 337, 667 P.2d 996 (1983), and to other......
  • State v. Threet
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • November 16, 1982
  • State v. Robles
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals
    • July 1, 2009
    ... ... at 153, 836 P.2d 1367 (police officer saw the defendant attempt to conceal a bag that was "rolled in a manner that [the officer] knew was commonly used to carry drugs and drug paraphernalia"); State v. Flores, 58 Or.App. 437, 439, 648 P.2d 1328, rem'd for recons. on other grounds, 294 Or. 77, 653 P.2d 960 (1982) (officer could see that the object that the defendant was attempting to conceal was a clear plastic sandwich bag of the type used for carrying drugs); State v. Hunt, 15 Or.App. 76, 80, 514 P.2d ... ...
  • State v. Brown
    • United States
    • Oregon Court of Appeals
    • January 15, 1992
    ...gestures alone cannot give rise to probable cause. State v. Flores, 58 Or.App. 437, 440, 648 P.2d 1328, rev'd on other grounds 294 Or. 77, 653 P.2d 960 (1982). Furtive gestures can give rise to probable cause only if they are coupled with an attempt to hide a suspicious object. 58 Or.App. a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT