State v. Flores
| Decision Date | 16 November 1982 |
| Citation | State v. Flores, 653 P.2d 960, 294 Or. 77 (Or. 1982) |
| Parties | STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review, v. Daniel FLORES, Petitioner on Review. TC 10-81-05891; CA A22413; SC 28913. |
| Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender and Ernest E. Estes, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed petition for review on behalf of petitioner on review.
Christine L. Dickey, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, filed brief in the Court of Appeals on behalf of respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen. and William F. Gary, Sol. Gen., Salem.
Petition for review allowed. Remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of State v. Caraher, 293 Or. 741, 653 P.2d 942 (Nov. 2, 1982).
* Appeal from Circuit Court, Lane County, Edwin E. Allen, Judge. 58 Or.App. 437, 648 P.2d 1328 (1982).
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
5 cases
-
State v. Flores
...in light of Oregon constitutional principles announced in State v. Caraher, 293 Or. 741, 653 P.2d 942 (1982). State v. Flores, 294 Or. 77, 653 P.2d 960 (1982). On remand, we look not only to Caraher but also to a later decision, State v. Lowry, 295 Or. 337, 667 P.2d 996 (1983), and to other......
- State v. Threet
-
State v. Robles
...carry drugs and drug paraphernalia"); State v. Flores, 58 Or.App. 437, 439, 648 P.2d 1328, rem'd for recons. on other grounds, 294 Or. 77, 653 P.2d 960 (1982) (officer could see that the object that the defendant was attempting to conceal was a clear plastic sandwich bag of the type used fo......
-
State v. Brown
...gestures alone cannot give rise to probable cause. State v. Flores, 58 Or.App. 437, 440, 648 P.2d 1328, rev'd on other grounds 294 Or. 77, 653 P.2d 960 (1982). Furtive gestures can give rise to probable cause only if they are coupled with an attempt to hide a suspicious object. 58 Or.App. a......
Get Started for Free