State v. Flowers
| Decision Date | 29 May 2002 |
| Citation | 798 A.2d 972,260 Conn. 929 |
| Parties | STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JERMANO C. FLOWERS |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
David V. DeRosa, special public defender, in support of the petition.
John A. East III, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 69 Conn. App. 57 (AC 20578/AC 20579), is denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
16 cases
-
State v. Pereira
...404 U.S. 477, 486, 92 S.Ct. 619, 30 L.Ed.2d 618 (1972); State v. Flowers, 69 Conn.App. 57, 76, 797 A.2d 1122, cert. denied, 260 Conn. 929, 798 A.2d 972 (2002). Thus, we proceed to the merits of the defendant's On the merits, however, the defendant's claim fails. To prevail on an unpreserved......
-
State v. Sherman
...consent of the owner.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Flowers, 69 Conn.App. 57, 69, 797 A.2d 1122, cert. denied, 260 Conn. 929, 798 A.2d 972 (2002). In addition to the broad definition of larceny, § 53a–119 also “enumerates eighteen separate examples that constitute larceny, i......
-
State v. Collins
...57, 71, 797 A.2d 1122 (instructions not considered in vacuum, but in context of factual issues raised at trial), cert. denied, 260 Conn. 929, 798 A.2d 972 (2002). Our focus is "on the substance of the charge rather than the form of what was said not only in light of the entire charge, but a......
-
State v. Coltherst
...consent of the owner." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Flowers, 69 Conn.App. 57, 69, 797 A.2d 1122, cert. denied, 260 Conn. 929, 798 A.2d 972 (2002). We conclude that, in this case, the court's charge included the essential elements of larceny, but failed to define one of these......
Request a trial to view additional results