State v. Forman

CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtWALKER, CHANCFLLOR.
CitationState v. Forman, 97 N.J.L. 168, 117 A. 50 (N.J. 1922)
Decision Date06 March 1922
Docket Number97
PartiesSTATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. ISAAC FORMAN, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR

(Syllabus by the Court.)

Error to Supreme Court.

Isaac Forman was convicted of receiving stolen goods knowing them to have been stolen, and he brought error to the Supreme Court, which affirmed the judgment, and he again brings error. Affirmed.

William R. Wilson, of Elizabeth, for plaintiff in error.

Walter L. Hetfield, Jr., Prosecutor of the Pleas, of Plainfleld, for the State.

WALKER, Ch. Plaintiff in error was convicted in the Union county sessions of the crime of receiving stolen goods knowing them to have been stolen. He removed the judgment into the Supreme Court by writ of error, where it was affirmed. He has removed the Supreme Court's judgment into this court.

This case was submitted on briefs, and in the brief for plaintiff in error this court is asked to consider this case under the act of April 12, 1921, P. L. p. 951, which provides that, whenever the entire record of the proceedings shall be returned with the writ of error (which was done in this case under the criminal procedure act, 2 Comp. Stat. p. 1863, § 136), if it shall appear from a consideration of the entire evidence that the verdict was against the weight of evidence, the appellate court shall remedy the wrong by reversing such verdict and awarding a new trial. This act was passed after the argument in the Supreme Court and before the submission of the case here.

Counsel argues that this act overcomes the objection that no relief could be granted the defendant because no exceptious had been taken. There was an exception to the admission of testimony, but no exception raising the grounds which were argued in the Supreme Court, namely, alleged errors appearing in the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • | State v. Leaks
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • January 11, 1940
    ...will be considered on appeal whether or not they have been raised below. State v. O'Leary, 110 N.J.L. 36, 163 A. 904; State v. Forman, 97 N.J.L. 168, 117 A. 50; State v. Belkota, 95 N.J.L. 416, 113 A. 142. And this, as has been said, is a matter involving public policy. The evidence in ques......
  • State v. O'Leary
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • January 23, 1933
    ...public policy are exceptions to the general rule that the reviewing tribunal will not examine questions not raised below. State v. Forman, 97 N. J. Law, 168, 117 A. 50; Mahnken v. Meltz, 97 N. J. Law, 159, 116 A. 791. The Court itself may notice these questions even if not raised. State v. ......
  • Staub v. The Public Service Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • March 6, 1922