State v. Forrester, S53469.
| Decision Date | 27 June 2006 |
| Docket Number | No. S53469.,S53469. |
| Citation | 341 Or. 141,139 P.3d 259 |
| Parties | STATE v. FORRESTER. |
| Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
Petition for review denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
16 cases
-
State v. Taylor
...whether a rational factfinder could find that the state proved the required elements beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Forrester, 203 Or.App. 151, 153, 125 P.3d 47 (2005), rev. den., 341 Or. 141, 139 P.3d 259 (2006). The state charged defendant with two counts of first-degree burglary in ......
-
State v. McCants, 06C44334.
...preserve a challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence by clearly raising the issue in closing argument. State v. Forrester, 203 Or.App. 151, 155, 125 P.3d 47 (2005), rev. den., 341 Or. 141, 139 P.3d 259 (2006); State v. Gonzalez, 188 Or.App. 430, 431, 71 P.3d 573 (2003). In all even......
-
State v. Hedgpeth
...at trial in closing argument, we will treat that argument as a preserved motion for judgment of acquittal. State v. Forrester , 203 Or. App. 151, 155, 125 P.3d 47 (2005), rev. den. , 341 Or. 141, 139 P.3d 259 (2006). We understand defendant's argument to the court to be based on the legal i......
-
State v. Giron-Cortez
...that it refers to a state of mind where an individual cares little about the risk of death of a human being." State v. Forrester , 203 Or App 151, 156, 125 P.3d 47 (2005), rev. den. , 341 Or. 141, 139 P.3d 259 (2006) (internal quotation marks omitted). A defendant's extreme indifference "ma......
Request a trial to view additional results