State v. Fraga
| Docket Number | A13-2381 |
| Decision Date | 22 April 2015 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
71 cases
-
State v. Lankford
...Lee , 346 So.2d 682, 683–85 (La. 1977) ; Weber v. State , 501 So.2d 1379, 1381–85 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987). But see State v. Fraga , 864 N.W.2d 615, 621–23 (Minn. 2015) (holding that the knowledge of two jurors that defendant was previously convicted for the same charges did not create an......
-
Ries v. State, A16-0220
...the juror did not sit on the jury). Indeed, an error only occurs if the biased juror actually sits on the jury. See State v. Fraga , 864 N.W.2d 615, 623 (Minn. 2015) ("Permitting a biased juror to serve is structural error requiring automatic reversal.").In sum, the court of appeals correct......
-
People v. Abu-Nantambu-El
...1249, 1259 (2011) (a defendant must demonstrate that a juror was actually biased in order to show structural error); State v. Fraga , 864 N.W.2d 615, 623 (Minn. 2015) ("Permitting a biased juror to serve is structural error requiring automatic reversal.").¶ 105 Fourth, bright-line rules of ......
-
State v. Lankford
...v. Lee, 346 So.2d 682, 683-85 (La. 1977); Weber v. State, 501 So.2d 1379, 1381-85 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987). But see State v. Fraga, 864 N.W.2d 615, 621-23 (Minn. 2015) (holding that the knowledge of two jurors that defendant was previously convicted for the same charges did not create an ......
Request a trial to view additional results