State v. Galan., 46402

Citation253 N.W.2d 386,312 Minn. 598
Decision Date15 April 1977
Docket NumberNo. 46402,46402
PartiesSTATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Faustino C. GALAN, Appellant.
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota (US)

C. Paul Jones, Public Defender, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Warren Spannaus, Atty. Gen., Richard G. Mark, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richard G. Evans, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Harlan L. Nelson, County Atty., Fergus Falls, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of a charge of aggravated assault, Minn.St. 609.225, subd. 1, and was sentenced by the trial court to a maximum of 10 years in prison. On this appeal from judgment of conviction, defendant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence but contends that he should be granted a new trial because of the allegedly improper admission of certain rebuttal testimony, and because of an arguably improper statement by the prosecutor in his closing argument. Defendant, by his failure to object, waived these issues and accordingly we do not reach them.

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT