State v. Gamble

Decision Date25 March 2010
Citation295 Conn. 915,990 A.2d 867
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
PartiesSTATE of Connecticut v. Hudel Clifton GAMBLE.

William B. Westcott, special public defender, in sup-port of the petition.

Timothy F. Costello, deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 119 Conn.App. 287, 987 A.2d 1049 (2010), is denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • State v. Ruiz-Pacheco
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • September 25, 2018
    ...accessorial liability and liability as a principal. See State v. Gamble , 119 Conn. App. 287, 297, 987 A.2d 1049, cert. denied, 295 Conn. 915, 990 A.2d 867 (2010). From that doctrinal basis, he asserts that the presence of multiple assailants should have no effect on the application of Nixo......
  • State v. Perez
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • December 17, 2013
    ...may be committed.'' (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Gamble, 119 Conn. App. 287, 297, 987 A.2d 1049, cert. denied, 295 Conn. 915, 990 A.2d 867 (2010). 25. We are cognizant of the following question certified by our Supreme Court in State v. Jordan, 305 Conn. 918, 47 A.3d 388 (20......
  • Gamble v. Comm'r of Corr.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • January 23, 2018
    ...Westcott, unsuccessfully appealed his conviction.3 See State v. Gamble , 119 Conn. App. 287, 987 A.2d 1049, cert. denied, 295 Conn. 915, 990 A.2d 867 (2010).On August 25, 2016, the petitioner filed a third amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging the ineffective assistance of ......
  • State v. Gamble
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • August 24, 2021
    ...trial, of manslaughter in the first degree with a firearm. State v. Gamble , 119 Conn. App. 287, 987 A.2d 1049, cert. denied, 295 Conn. 915, 990 A.2d 867 (2010). The relevant facts, which the jury reasonably could have found, and procedural history were set out in this court's opinion affir......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT