State v. Garrett

Decision Date10 October 1996
Citation683 A.2d 398,239 Conn. 928
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
PartiesSTATE of Connecticut v. Robert L. GARRETT.

Kelly J. Goulet, Deputy Assistant Public Defender, in support of the petition.

Ronald G. Weller, Assistant State's Attorney, in opposition.

The request by the Appellate Court panel for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 42 Conn.App. 507, 681 A.2d 362 (AC 14385), is denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • State v. Gilbert
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • April 6, 1999
    ...evidence in the state's case-in-chief. See also State v. Garrett, 42 Conn. App. 507, 514 n.6, 681 A.2d 362, cert. denied, 239 Conn. 928, 929, 683 A.2d 398 (1996). In Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 316, 99 S. Ct. 2781, 61 L. Ed. 2d 560 (1979), the United States Supreme Court held that it......
  • State v. Spillane, (AC 17194)
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • July 13, 1999
    ... ... Although Rutan has been criticized, it nevertheless remains the law. See, e.g., State v. Simino, 200 Conn. 113, 118 n.5, 509 A.2d 1039 (1986) ; State v. Lizzi, 199 Conn. 462, 464-65, 508 A.2d 16 (1986) ; State v. Duhan, 194 Conn. 347, 382, 481 A.2d 48 (1984) ; State v. Garrett, 42 Conn. App. 507, 514 n.6, 681 A.2d 362, cert. denied, 239 Conn. 928, 929, 683 A.2d 397 (1996) ...          54 Conn. App. 207 The defendant, however, asks us to make an exception to the rule in Rutan and to rule that where the defendant goes forward and does not fill in any ... ...
  • State v. Forde
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • March 9, 1999
    ...Oehman, 212 Conn. 325, 336, 562 A.2d 493 (1989)." State v. Garrett, 42 Conn. App. 507, 515-16, 681 A.2d 362, cert. denied, 239 Conn. 928, 929, 683 A.2d 398 (1996). To make this determination, we must focus on several factors: "`(1) the extent to which the misconduct was invited by defense c......
  • State v. Cansler
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • September 14, 1999
    ...standard for reviewing this claim is set forth in State v. Garrett, 42 Conn. App. 507, 514-18, 681 A.2d 362, cert. denied, 239 Conn. 928, 929, 683 A.2d 398 (1996) (holding that alleged claim of prosecutorial misconduct failed to satisfy third prong of Golding). "In order to deprive a defend......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT