State v. Goddard

Decision Date08 July 1913
Citation69 Or. 73,133 P. 90
PartiesSTATE v. GODDARD.
CourtOregon Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County; J.U. Campbell, Judge.

John B Goddard was convicted of rape, and he appeals. On motion to dismiss appeal. Overruled.

The defendant was indicted for the crime of rape, and upon trial was convicted by a jury who recommended him to the mercy of the court. The court thereupon sentenced him to the penitentiary for a period of 20 years, and in the same judgment paroled him; the parole condition being as follows "The court taking into consideration the recommendation of the jury that the defendant be paroled, it is ordered that the sentence in this cause be suspended, and the defendant is allowed to go at large on parole, on conditions that he will not leave the jurisdiction of this court, and that he will not violate the laws of the United States or of this state or of any municipality in which he may live, and that he will at all times lead an honorable and upright life, and that he shall report in person or writing once a month to the presiding judge of this court his whereabouts with such other and additional information as may be desired or demanded by said judge."

Section 1589, L.O.L., is as follows: "If any prisoner when required shall fail to give such bail, bond, or security, or shall fail to observe all and every of the conditions and requirements of said parole and order of said court, or shall be again convicted of a felony, then said parole shall be by order of said court revoked with or without notice to such prisoner, and said prisoner shall be committed to the penitentiary to serve out the original sentence imposed in the same manner as though said parole had not been granted. The clerk shall deliver to the sheriff a certified copy of the sentence, together with a certificate that such person had been paroled and his parole has been terminated, and the sheriff shall, upon the receipt of such certified copy of sentence, immediately arrest such person and transport and deliver him or her to the warden of the penitentiary, and the time such person shall have been at large upon parole shall not be counted as part of the sentence, but the time of sentence shall be counted from the day of delivery to the warden of the penitentiary."

Nothing appears to indicate that the defendant requested a parole nor is any request or acceptance provided for in section 1586, L.O.L., which is as follows: "When any adult person who has not previously been convicted of a felony shall be convicted in any circuit court of this state of any felony or misdemeanor, the maximum punishment of which does not exceed ten years' imprisonment in the penitentiary or any minor person who has not previously been convicted of a felony shall be convicted in any circuit court of this state of any felony or misdemeanor, the maximum...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • State v. Carpenter, 7300
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • January 2, 1947
    ... ... 275, 5 L.R.A.,N.S., 1064, 10 ... Ann.Cas. 199; 39 Am.Jur. 547, § 47 ... A ... parole is distinguishable from a pardon and a conditional ... pardon and simply provides for a different manner of serving ... a sentence than by confinement in a prison. State v ... Goddard, 169 Or. 73, 133 P. 90, Ann.Cas.1916A, 146; ... Carpenter v. Lord, 88 Or. 128, 171 P. 577, ... L.R.A.1918D, 674; Ex parte Peterson, 14 Cal.2d 82, 92 P.2d ... The ... presumption of law is in favor of the validity of a marriage ... (Huff v. Huff, 20 Idaho 450, 118 P. 1080), and the ... ...
  • Eacret v. Holmes
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • December 24, 1958
    ...333 P.2d 741 ... 215 Or. 121 ... John W. EACRET and Lillie M. Eacret, Appellants, ... Robert D. HOLMES, Governor of the State of Oregon, Respondent ... Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc ... Argued Dec. 10, 1958 ... Decided Dec. 24, 1958 ...         [215 Or. 122] ... Among a host of authorities, it is sufficient to cite the following: State v. Goddard, 69 Or. 73, 78, 133 P. 90, 138 P. 243; Jamison v. Flanner, supra; State v. Harrison, 122 [215 Or. 128] S.C. 523, 115 S.E. 746; Martin v. State, 21 ... ...
  • State v. Montgomery
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 11, 1927
    ... ...         Relator concedes the validity of our parole law. In this he is sustained by the great weight of authority. R. C. L. vol. 20, 577, 578; In re Patterson, 94 Kan. 439, 146 P. 1009, L. R. A. 1915F, 541; People v. Roth, 249 Ill. 532, 94 N. E. 953, Ann. Cas. 1912A, 100; State v. Goddard, 69 Or. 73, 133 P. 90, Ann. Cas. 1916A, 146; 4 Ann. Cas. 1111. The power to parole is lodged with the trial courts, and the action of any court or judge in granting or terminating a parole is not subject to review by an appellate court. Sections 4155-4157, 4167, R. S. 1919 ...         The ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT