State v. Goodhart
| Decision Date | 07 October 1941 |
| Citation | State v. Goodhart, 112 Vt. 154, 22 A.2d 151 (Vt. 1941) |
| Parties | STATE v. ROZER GOODHART |
| Court | Vermont Supreme Court |
May Term, 1941.
Circumstantial Evidence.---1.Consideration of Evidence Upon Motion for Directed Verdict.---2.Circumstantial Evidence Must Create More than Suspicion.---3.Circumstantial Evidence Must Exclude Hypothesis of Innocence.---4.Circumstances Consistent with Innocence.---5.Directed Verdict When Circumstantial Evidence Fails.
1.In passing upon a respondent's motion for a directed verdict, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the State, excluding the effect of modifying evidence.
2.Although proof of guilt may be made by circumstantial evidence, the circumstances proved must do more than create a mere suspicion of guilt, however strong.
3.The circumstances relied upon to prove guilt by circumstantial evidence must exclude every reasonable hypothesis except that the respondent is guilty.
4.Where there is no proof of malice, intent or motive, foot tracks having different size than the respondent's, the respondent's presence in the neighborhood several hours after the alleged crime and false statements by the respondent when arrested are as consistent with other hypotheses as with that of guilt of first degree arson.
5.Where circumstantial evidence alone is relied upon in a criminal case and such evidence is as consistent with other hypotheses as with that of guilt, a directed verdict should be ordered for the respondent.
INFORMATION FOR ARSON.Trial by jury, March Term, 1941Washington County Court, Shields, J., presiding.Verdict and judgment of guilty.The opinion states the case.
Judgment reversed, conviction and sentence set aside and respondent discharged.
Raymond B. Daniels for respondent.
Reginald T. Abare, States's Attorney, for the State.
Present MOULTON, C. J., SHERBURNE, BUTTLES, STURTEVANT and JEFFORDS, JJ.
The respondent was convicted in County Court of the crime of arson in the first degree in wilfully and maliciously burning the house and barn of Edward McCall in Cabot, Vermont, in the early morning of Dec. 2, 1940.He has brought the case here on exceptions, one of which was taken to the denial by the trial court of respondent's motion for a directed verdict of not guilty, made at the close of the State's case and renewed at the close of all the evidence.The grounds upon which this motion was based were in substance, (1) that there was no evidence from which the jury could find the corpus delicti, in other words that the fire was of incendiary origin, and (2) that there was no evidence from which the jury could find that the burning was the act of the respondent.
In passing upon this motion the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the State.Picknell v. Bean, 99 Vt. 39, 41, 130 A. 578;MacDonald v. Orton, 99 Vt. 425, 427, 134 A. 599;State v. Rounds, 104 Vt. 442, 448, 160 A. 249.The effect of modifying evidence is to be excluded.Tinney v. Crosby,ante p. 95, 22 A.2d 145, (decided at the present term of court);Ste. Marie v. Wells, 93 Vt. 398, 399, 108 A. 270.
From the evidence so viewed the following facts appear.The buildings, whose destruction by fire at the time alleged is undisputed, were located on opposite sides of a side road leading off, in a northeasterly direction, from the main road leading from Cabot to Walden.The house was on the northerly and the barn on the southerly side of the road.There was only one other occupied house on this side road, which was that of the witness Petit situated about 600 or 700 feet northerly from these buildings.The McCall house and barn were both rectangular in shape, the house being about 54 by 22 feet and the barn about 80 by 32 feet with the shorter dimension of each building toward the road.At the rear of the northeasterly corner of the house there was a woodshed and about 68 feet from the rear of the barn there was a tool house with metal roof which was the only building that did not burn.The distance between the house and barn was about 44 to 46 feet.Awakened by a member of his household at about 1 A.M., Mr. Petit looked from his window and saw that both the McCall house and barn were all afire but there was more fire in the farther end of each building, that is in the end away from the road and the other building.The woodshed was also burning.There was a considerable amount of snow on the ground.A hard westerly wind was blowing, the general direction being away from the house toward the barn.
Mr. McCall was a patient in a Burlington hospital where he had been since Nov. 24th.The other occupants of the McCall home, a hired boy 19 years old named Francis Perry, Mrs. Alexander, a sister, and Mrs. Anzelone, a daughter of McCall, went to Burlington on Sunday, the day before the fire to visit Mr. McCall and did not return that night.The evidence does not disclose that there was anyone in the house or barn after they left at about 4:15 Sunday afternoon.When these people left there were two wood fires burning--one in the kitchen stove at the rear of the house and the other in a stove in the sitting room near the middle of the house.On the roof of the barn there was a wind charger or wind mill which generated electricity for the radio and lights in the house.Wires ran from the wind charger to a storage battery in the front room of the house.When the wind charger was allowed to run too long in a high wind the battery would become overcharged and make trouble.On one occasion the wires had been burned out in this way and the window jamb set on fire.It did not appear that the wind charger had been turned off before the people left the house on Sunday.
Mr Petit and another witness who arrived early at the fire observed a man's tracks in the snow approaching the rear of the house at the corner opposite the woodshed and coming as if from the Walden-Cabot road.A set of similar tracks was discovered leading away from the house in a somewhat more southerly direction,...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting