State v. Goodwater, No. WD 75441.
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM: |
| Citation | 414 S.W.3d 675 |
| Decision Date | 19 November 2013 |
| Docket Number | No. WD 75441. |
| Parties | STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Paul Ray GOODWATER, Appellant. |
414 S.W.3d 675
STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Paul Ray GOODWATER, Appellant.
No. WD 75441.
Missouri Court of Appeals,
Western District.
Nov. 19, 2013.
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Johnson County, Missouri, R. Michael Wagner, Judge.
Timothy A. Blackwell, for Respondent.
Nancy A. McKerrow, for Appellant.
[414 S.W.3d 676]
Before Division II: MARK D. PFEIFFER, Presiding Judge, JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge and VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Paul Goodwater appeals from his convictions following a jury trial for twenty counts of possession of child pornography, section 573.037, RSMo Cum.Supp.2012. In his sole point on appeal, he claims that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding the proposed testimony of eleven witnesses that he had repaired their computers and had backed up their files as part of the process. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment of convictions is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Goodwater v. State, WD 80756
...whose computers Goodwater had repaired. This Court affirmed the trial court's judgment in a per curiam opinion, State v. Goodwater , 414 S.W.3d 675, 676 (Mo. App. W.D. 2013).Evidentiary Hearing on the Rule 29.15 MotionGoodwater timely filed his Rule 29.15 motion. He raised nine claims, thre......
-
Goodwater v. State, WD 80756
...whose computers Goodwater had repaired. This Court affirmed the trial court's judgment in a per curiam opinion, State v. Goodwater , 414 S.W.3d 675, 676 (Mo. App. W.D. 2013).Evidentiary Hearing on the Rule 29.15 MotionGoodwater timely filed his Rule 29.15 motion. He raised nine claims, thre......