State v. La Grave

Decision Date09 August 1895
Docket Number1,430.
PartiesSTATE ex rel. PYNE v. LA GRAVE, State Comptroller.
CourtNevada Supreme Court

Petition for mandamus, on the relation of George D. Pyne, against C A. La Grave, state comptroller. Writ denied.

J Poujade, for relator.

Robt. M. Beatty, Atty. Gen., for respondent.

BELKNAP J.

This is an application for a writ of mandamus requiring respondent as comptroller of state, to draw his warrant in favor of relator, as secretary of Company B. first regiment, Nevada National Guard, for the rent of an armory for the company for the month of April, 1895. The statute under which the claim is made is as follows: "Sec. 11. It shall be the duty of the board of county commissioners of any county in which public arms, accouterments, or military stores are now had or shall hereafter be received for the use of any volunteer organized militia company to provide a suitable and safe armory for organized militia companies within said county. All claims for the expense of procuring and maintaining armories shall be audited and approved by the board of military auditors, and upon approval of such claims they shall be presented to the state controller who shall draw his warrant upon the state treasury for the amount so approved, and upon presentation of said warrant, the state treasurer shall pay the same out of the general fund. Such expenses shall not exceed seventy-five ($75) dollars per month for any company except that each company regularly drilling with field pieces or machine guns and using horses therewith, may be allowed an additional sum not to exceed twelve and 50/100 ($12.50) dollars per month for each piece or gun." St. 1895, p. 109. In his petition relator states that the county commissioners of Storey county provided an armory for the use of the company during the period mentioned, and that a claim amounting to the sum of $75 therefor was audited and approved by the board of military auditors and the state board of examiners, etc. It will be observed that the statute provides that the county commissioners shall provide a suitable and safe armory; but whether they, or the owners of the armory building, or the company, shall present the claim for the expense of so doing, is not clear. But, aside from this, it is beyond controversy that it is only the actual expense incurred in procuring and maintaining an armory, not to exceed $75 a month, that shall constitute a charge...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • State v. Boerlin
    • United States
    • Nevada Supreme Court
    • December 5, 1908
    ... ... Browker, 14 Nev. 336; State v. Com'rs, 22 ... Nev. 263, 38 P. 668. Nor will mandamus lie unless a clear ... legal right to the remedy is shown. State v. Noyes, ... 25 Nev. 49, 56 P. 946; State v. Stoddard, 25 Nev ... 464, 62 P. 237, 51 L. R. A. 229; State v. Le Grave, ... 22 Nev. 417, 41 P. 115; State v. Meder, 22 Nev. 264, ... 38 P. 668; 19 A. & E. Encyc. L. 725; 19 Cyc. 151. Though this ... proceeding consumed six days in submitting it to the court, ... and able and exhaustive arguments were made by counsel on ... both sides, as well as by counsel ... ...
  • Appel v. State ex rel. Shutter-Cottrell
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • August 1, 1900
    ... ... Wash., 156; 2 Beach Pub. Corp., 872; 13 Ency. Pl. & Pr., ... 675; 4 id., 658; O'Keefe v. Foster, 5 Wyo., 343; ... Bank v. Charles, 86 Cal. 322; Bank v. Ludvigsen, ... 8 Wyo., 56 P. 994.) The plaintiff must show a clear ... legal right. (High Ex. Leg. Rem., 450; State v. La ... Grave, 22 Nev. 417; State v. Barber, 4 Wyo., ... 409.) The employment of the relator was unauthorized. R ... R. Co. v. Baker, 6 Wyo., 369, 45 P. 494; 7 Ency. L., ... 979; Mellor v. Board, 35 P. 712 (Ida.); R. S. Secs ... 1078, 1106, 1079, 1104, 1110; 2 Beach Pub. Corp., 643; ... Modoc Co ... ...
  • State v. Stoddard
    • United States
    • Nevada Supreme Court
    • September 21, 1900
    ...proceedings in mandamus, will grant the peremptory writ only when the right sought to be protected is clear and undoubted. State v. La Grave, 22 Nev. 417, 41 P. 115; v. Meder, 22 Nev. 265, 38 P. 668; Same v. Wheeler, 23 Nev. 143, 44 P. 430. The act of 1891, upon which relator rests his righ......
  • Hardin v. Guthrie
    • United States
    • Nevada Supreme Court
    • November 30, 1901
    ... ... act to provide for a more uniform valuation and assessment of ... property in this state," approved March 16, 1901 (St ... Nev. 1901, p. 61), did fix the value of the property at $17 ... per head, as required by the state board of ... upon a showing that the petitioner has a clear legal right to ... that sought by the proceeding. State v. La Grave, 22 ... Nev. 417, 41 P. 115; State v. Stoddard, 25 Nev. 452, ... 62 P. 237. Such showing is not made either by the petition or ... by the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT