State v. Gray, 97-4342.

Decision Date28 October 1998
Docket NumberNo. 97-4342.,97-4342.
Citation721 So.2d 370
PartiesSTATE of Florida, Appellant, v. David GRAY, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Myra J. Fried, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Marcy K. Allen, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

WARNER, Judge.

The state appeals from an order that it characterizes as a downward departure sentence, which was imposed after the court found that the appellee had violated his community control. Since the trial court modified the conditions of appellee's community control but did not revoke it, we conclude that the state may not appeal from such an order. Section 948.06(1), Florida Statutes (1997), provides, in pertinent part, that after a probation violation hearing, the court may "revoke, modify, or continue the probation or community control." Only where the court revokes probation must the court impose a sentence. See id. Even when an appellant admits a probation violation, the court is not required to revoke the probation and sentence the offender on the underlying charge. See id.

Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(c)(1), the state can appeal an illegal sentence or a downward departure sentence. However, we can find no authority for the state to appeal a modification of probation since the court does not "sentence" a probationer when it modifies probation. We agree with State v. Blackman, 488 So.2d 644, 644 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986), that the rules permit only a defendant to appeal an order revoking or modifying probation; the rules do not allow the state to do so.

Dismissed.

GUNTHER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • State v. Lafave
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 9, 2012
    ...does not result in the imposition of a sentence. See State v. Blackman, 488 So.2d 644, 644 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); State v. Gray, 721 So.2d 370, 371 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); see also State v. Russell, 67 So.3d 1179 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (relying on Gray in dismissing a state appeal of an order modify......
  • Gibson v. State, 97-03477.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 28, 1998
  • State v. Bell
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 18, 2003
    ...appeal modifications of probation or community control. See, e.g., State v. Heddon, 840 So.2d 439 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003); State v. Gray, 721 So.2d 370 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); State v. Blackman, 488 So.2d 644 (Fla. 2d DCA From these two lines of cases, a consistent general rule emerges: upon a vio......
  • State v. Watson, 5D05-921.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 12, 2005
    ...is not a "sentence." See also State v. Bell, 854 So.2d 686 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003), rev. denied, 866 So.2d 1212 (Fla.2004); State v. Gray, 721 So.2d 370 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); State v. Blackman, 488 So.2d 644 (Fla. 2d DCA The state argues that State v. Santomaso, 764 So.2d 735 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000),......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT