State v. Gregory

Decision Date13 February 2003
Citation817 A.2d 108,262 Conn. 948
PartiesSTATE OF CONNECTICUT v. MARCUS GREGORY
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court

Kent Drager, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

Susann E. Gill, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 74 Conn. App. 248(AC 22337), is denied.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
13 cases
  • State v. Lewis
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • 29 Octubre 2019
    ...that there was a reasonable and articulable suspicion for the police to detain him" [citations omitted] ), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 948, 817 A.2d 108 (2003) ; see also State v. Mitchell , 204 Conn. 187, 190, 196, 527 A.2d 1168 (1987) (that defendant was wearing blue sweatpants, not maroon sw......
  • State v. Manousos
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • 23 Enero 2018
    ...provided was sufficiently similar taken together with additional facts that supported reasonable suspicion), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 948, 817 A.2d 108 (2003). Accordingly, we conclude that the court properly determined that, under the totality of the circumstances, the investigatory stop wa......
  • Gregory v. Comm'r of Corr.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • 11 Abril 2023
    ...in connection therewith (Bridgeport cases). See State v. Gregory, 74 Conn.App. 248, 254-55, 812 A.2d 102 (2002), cert, denied, 262 Conn. 948, 817 A.2d 108 (2003). In September, 1999, the petitioner entered conditional of nolo contendere to two counts of kidnapping in the first degree in vio......
  • State v. Farr
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • 17 Octubre 2006
    ...in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Gregory, 74 Conn.App. 248, 262-63, 812 A.2d 102 (2002), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 948, 817 A.2d 108 (2003). Our review of the record discloses that the facts concerning the patdown are not sufficiently developed to consider this issue. ......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT