State v. Guillory
| Decision Date | 17 November 1989 |
| Docket Number | No. 89-K-1540,89-K-1540 |
| Citation | 551 So.2d 1334 |
| Parties | STATE of Louisiana v. Solomon GUILLORY. 551 So.2d 1334 |
| Court | Louisiana Supreme Court |
In re Guillory, Solomon;--Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CR88-0687; Parish of Evangeline, 13th Judicial District Court, Div. "A", No. 37993.
Prior report: La.App., 544 So.2d 643.
Denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
10 cases
-
White v. State
... ... The other black veniremember had previously been arrested for assault and resisting arrest. Scales v. State, 539 So.2d 1074, 1075 (Ala.1988) (prior arrest record); Levert v. State, 512 So.2d 790, 795 (Ala.Cr.App.1987) (juror not sure she could be fair and impartial); State v. Guillory, 544 So.2d 643, 650 (La.App.), cert. denied, 551 So.2d 1334 (La.1989) (shared the same friends) ... The defendant argues that his conviction is not supported by the evidence because, he argues, that evidence does not show that he knowingly and unlawfully entered his wife's ... ...
-
State v. Brown
... ... The failure of the State to produce exculpatory evidence constitutes reversible error when the evidence would create a reasonable doubt, which would otherwise not exist in the context of the whole record. State v. Guillory , 544 So.2d 643, 647 (La. App. 3 Cir.), writ denied , 551 So.2d 1334 (La. 1989); State v. Hamilton , 470 So.2d 604, 607 (La. App. 1 Cir. 1985). We find that the defendant has failed to show that the State suppressed any evidence in this case. We further note that even if a discovery or Brady ... ...
-
State v. Otis
... ... State v. Wilkerson, 403 So.2d 652 (La.1981). However, the momentary use of restraints for the limited purposes of transporting an accused does not mandate a mistrial. State v. Wilkerson, supra; State v. Guillory, 544 So.2d 643 (La.App. 3d Cir.1989), writ denied, 551 So.2d 1334 (La.1989) ... In the present case, defense counsel moved for a mistrial on the grounds that a majority of the jury saw defendant escorted across the hall in shackles following a morning break in the proceedings ... ...
-
96-1043 La.App. 3 Cir. 2/5/97, State v. Taylor
... ... 14:10(1). Even though intent is a question of fact, it may be inferred from the circumstances of the transaction and the actions of the defendant. The existence of specific intent is an ultimate legal conclusion to be resolved by the trier of fact ... State v. Guillory, 540 So.2d 1212, 1215 (La.App. 3 Cir.1989) (citations omitted) ... The legal foundation of a conspiracy conviction is the combination of at least two minds for an unlawful purpose. State v. D'Ingianni, 217 La. 945, 47 So.2d 731 (La.1950); State v. Joles, 485 So.2d 212 (La.App ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results