State v. Gutheil

Decision Date30 January 1940
Docket Number6123
Citation98 P.2d 943,98 Utah 205
CourtUtah Supreme Court
PartiesSTATE v. GUTHEIL

Appeal from District Court, Third District, Salt Lake Country; Lewis Jones, Judge.

Lewis C. Gutheil was convicted of involuntary manslaughter, and he appeals.

Verdict and judgment vacated and set aside, and case remanded with directions.

H. A Smith, F. R. Gasser, and Paul E. Reimann, all of Salt Lake City, for appellant.

Joseph Chez, Atty. Gen., and Zelph S. Calder, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

PRATT Justice. MOFFAT, C. J., and WOLFE, LARSON, and McDONOUGH JJ., concur.

OPINION

PRATT, Justice.

Lewis C. Gutheil was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter. The jury recommended leniency. He was sentenced to six months in the County jail. He appeals his case.

The facts are these: On the night of April 9, 1938, about 12 o'clock, near 3500 South State Street in Salt Lake County, Utah, a black Chevrolet coupe occupied by Thomas R.McLean and Wallace Miller, stalled. They had been driving south on State Street on the west side. McLean and Miller with the aid of McLean's father who happened along at the time, started pushing the coupe in a southeasterly direction across State Street. The father was walking on the left hand front side of the machine guiding it with the steering wheel. The boys were at the back of the machine pushing it. The course of the coupe was at an angle against northbound traffic and, if continued, would have passed through all northbound traffic lanes. There is a conflict of testimony as to whether or not the lights of the McLean coupe were burning. The pavement was wet. The street at this point was lighted with sodium lights; and at a place called Uncle Bill's Inn, neon signs were burning. There is a slight conflict in the testimony as to visibility at the time. It had been raining, but as to the particular moment of the collision, the testimony is in conflict upon this point, the defendant and his witnesses contending that there was a drizzle, necessitating the running of his windshield wiper; the McLean's contending that there was not.

The coupe pushed by the boys and guided by the father, crossed the center line of State Street and into the center lane of the northbound traffic. The defendant, Gutheil, with a lady friend, and also a gentleman friend, all seated in the front seat in that order from left to right, was driving north on State in the northbound center lane. He was driving about 30 to 35 miles per hour, the speed limit there being 40 miles per hour. His brakes were in good condition; his lights were on; his windshield wiper was running; there was no drinking involved and there was nothing out of the ordinary about his driving. When Gutheil discovered the coupe in his path, he applied his brakes and turned to the west--to the back of the coupe--to miss it. The boys in back of the machine were not visible to him, nor was the father. The latter had seen the approach of Gutheil's automobile and shouted to the boys to look out. The father jumped forward clear of the coupe; the boys stood up. Gutheil's automobile struck the right rear wheel of the coupe. Both boys were knocked to the pavement, whether by Gutheil's automobile or by the coupe is uncertain. The Miller boy was knocked some sixty feet away. He died as a result of the injuries received. It was his death...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • United States v. Costello
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • April 5, 1955
    ...Morley, 7 Cir., 99 F. 2d 683, 685; United States v. Dried Fruit Association of California, D.C.N.D.Cal., 4 F.R.D. 1, 5; State v. Gutheil, 98 Utah 205, 98 P.2d 943, 944; People v. Kovacevich, 19 Cal.App.2d 335, 65 P.2d 807, 809; State v. Newman, 127 Conn. 398, 17 A. 2d 774, 775. See, also, n......
  • Cutshall v. State
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • October 13, 1941
    ... ... to consequences * * *". The definition imports conduct ... reasonably calculated to injure others and creating notable ... and apparent potentialities for the causing of death or great ... injury to others. See Bell v. Commonwealth, 170 Va ... 597, 195 S.E. 675; State v. Gutheil, 98 Utah 205, 98 ... P.2d 943 ... The ... driving of a vehicle by one who is under the influence of ... intoxicating liquor is a misdemeanor. § 49, ch. 200, Laws ... 1938. The driving of an automobile while in this condition is ... therefore per se negligence. Williams v. State, ... ...
  • State v. Murphy, 16412
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • September 9, 1980
    ...(1978); see also State v. Potello, 40 Utah 56, 119 P. 1023 (1911).6 State v. Housekeeper, Utah, 588 P.2d 139 (1978); State v. Gutheil, 98 Utah 205, 98 P.2d 943 (1940).7 U.C.A. 1953, 77-21-43; see also U.C.A., 1953, 77-17-3 and State v. Rohletter, 108 Utah 452, 160 P.2d 963 (1945).8 U.C.A., ......
  • State v. Thatcher
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • March 29, 1945
    ... ... mere thoughtless omission or slight deviation from the norm ... of prudent conduct" is not sufficient to support a ... finding of criminal negligence. State v ... Lingman , 97 Utah 180, 91 P. 2d 457, 466; ... State v. Newton , 105 Utah 561, 144 P. 2d ... 290; State v. Gutheil , 98 Utah 205, 98 P ... 2d 943; State v. Adamson , 101 Utah 534, 125 ... P. 2d 429; State v. Busby , 102 Utah 416, ... 131 P. 2d 510, 144 A.L.R. 1468; State v ... Bleazard , 103 Utah 113, 133 P. 2d 1000 ... [108 ... Utah 70] As hereinabove pointed out one of the reckless ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT