State v. Haight
| Decision Date | 17 May 2005 |
| Citation | 875 A.2d 44,273 Conn. 939 |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE of Connecticut v. Andrew C. HAIGHT. |
Sarah Hanna, special deputy assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.
Brenden P. Leydon, Stamford, in opposition.
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 88 Conn.App. 235, 869 A.2d 251(2005), is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that at the time of his arrest the defendant was not operating his motor vehicle?"
The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17435.
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 cases
-
Sengchanthong v. COM'R OF MOTOR VEHICLES
...Swift, supra, 125 Conn. 399, 6 A.2d 359 with State v. Haight, 88 Conn.App. 235, 869 A.2d 251, cert. granted on other grounds, 273 Conn. 939, 875 A.2d 44 (2005), and State v. DeCoster, 147 Conn. 502, 162 A.2d 704 (1960).12 Here, at the time the officer approached, the plaintiff was not doing......
-
Richardson v. Good Shepard Christian Church, No. CV05-500 02 17 S (Conn. Super. 7/17/2006)
...a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. See State v. Haight, 88 Conn.App. 235, 239, 869 A.2d 251, cert. denied, 273 Conn. 939, 875 A.2d 44 (2005); State v. Gracia, 51 Conn.App. 4, 12, 719 A.2d 1196 (1998). In Haight the court stated that "[t]he definition of operation of a motor veh......