State v. Hanks
| Decision Date | 27 October 1995 |
| Citation | 235 Conn. 926,666 A.2d 1187 |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE of Connecticut v. Ronell HANKS. STATE of Connecticut v. Jose ROQUE. |
Neal Cone, Assistant Public Defender, in support of petition.
Frederick W. Fawcett, Assistant State's Attorney, in opposition.
The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 39 Conn.App. 333, 665 A.2d 102(AC 13430/13636), is denied.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
12 cases
-
State v. Reddick
...1200, cert. denied, 260 Conn. 936, 802 A.2d 89 (2002) ; State v. Hanks , 39 Conn.App. 333, 344, 665 A.2d 102, cert. denied, 235 Conn. 926, 666 A.2d 1187 (1995). In this case, the prosecutor's comments during his opening closing argument merely summarized Bryce's unobjected-to testimony that......
-
State v. Campfield
...commit the intended crime and not what acts have been done. State v. Hanks, 39 Conn.App. 333, 341, 665 A.2d 102, cert. denied, 235 Conn. 926, 666 A.2d 1187 (1995). The defendant's request to charge concerning planning, however, attempts to shift the focus to what acts have been done and, th......
-
State v. Daniel B.
...on what the actor has already done and not what remains to be done" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 235 Conn. 926, 666 A.2d 1187 (1995).7 We agree that our law in this area has been less than clear, and we take this opportunity to clarify. We do not cast any doubts, howe......
-
State v. Daniel B.
...(Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Hanks, 39 Conn.App. 333, 338–39, 665 A.2d 102, cert. denied, 235 Conn. 926, 666 A.2d 1187 (1995). The law relevant to an insufficiency of the evidence claim teaches that “the jury must find every element proven beyond a reasona......
Get Started for Free