State v. Hargrave

Decision Date30 June 1871
CitationState v. Hargrave, 65 N.C. 466 (N.C. 1871)
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesTHE STATE v. CALDWELL HARGRAVE.
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Under the act of February 22nd, 1861, acts of 1860-'61, chap. ____, the least penetration of the person of a female against her will, constitutes the crime of rape.

This was an indictment for rape, tried before Logan, J., at Spring Term, 1871, of GASTON Superior Court.

The prosecutrix testified that she had been thrown down by the prisoner, and that he then had his will with her and effected a penetration of her person, and in consequence thereof she was rendered very sore in her body, that she was aged sixteen years, and that no blood was found upon her person or clothing.

The defendant's counsel intimated that the evidence was not sufficient to constitute the crime of rape, that there was no such penetration as required by law, since the hymen was not broken.

His Honor charged the jury that any, the slightest penetration was sufficient to constitute the crime, and that it was unnecessary that the hymen should be broken. To which the prisoner excepted. Verdict of guilty. Judgment and appeal.

Attorney General for the State .

Guion for the prisoner .

BOYDEN, J.

There is no error. His Honor left it to the jury, upon the testimony, to find whether there had been any penetration; stating that any, the least penetration was sufficient to constitute the crime of rape, and that it was not necessary to constitute this crime, that the hymen should be ruptured. His Honor was well warranted by authority in thus charging the jury. See 9 Carrington & Payne...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
22 cases
  • GP, Matter of
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • March 22, 1984
    ...the hymen be ruptured; the entering of the vulva or labia is sufficient. G.S. § 14-23; State v. Monds, 130 N.C. 697, 41 S.E. 789; State v. Hargrave, 65 N.C. 466; State v. Storkey, 63 N.C. 7; Burdick: Law of Crime, section 477; 44 Am.Jur., Rape, section 3; 52 C.J., Rape, sections 23, 24.' St......
  • Romulus v. Romulus
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • September 20, 2011
    ...the entering of the vulva or labia is sufficient. G.S. 14–23; State v. Monds, 130 N.C. 697, 41 S.E. 789 [ (1902) ]; State v. Hargrave, 65 N.C. 466 [ (1871) ]; State v. Storkey, 63 N.C. 7 [ (1868) ]; Burdick: Law of Crime, section 477; 44 Am.Jur., Rape, section 3; 52 C.J. Rape, sections 23, ......
  • Poe v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • May 9, 1910
    ...that will be sufficient to constitute penetration." 2 Bishop, Crim. Law, § 1132; 33 Cyc. 1422; Morris v. State, 54 Ga. 440; State v. Hargrave, 65 N.C. 466; People v. Crowley, 102 N.Y. 234, 6 384. The testimony of the girl who was assaulted and of the physician who examined her was sufficien......
  • State v. Carnagy
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • October 20, 1898
    ...107 (25 P. 1000). Proof of the slightest penetration is sufficient to sustain the charge of rape. See cases above cited, and also State v. Hargrave, 65 N.C. 466; People v. Crowley, 102 N.Y. 234 (6 N.E. Rodgers v. State, 30 Tex. Ct. App. 510 (17 S.W. 1077); Reg. v. Allen, 9 Car. & P. 31. The......
  • Get Started for Free