State v. Hayes, No. 62377

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Missouri
Writing for the CourtROBERT R. WELBORN; MORGAN, P. J., BARDGETT and RENDLEN, JJ., and HOUSER
Citation624 S.W.2d 16
Decision Date10 November 1981
Docket NumberNo. 1,No. 62377
PartiesSTATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Elmer Richard HAYES, Appellant

Page 16

624 S.W.2d 16
STATE of Missouri, Respondent,
v.
Elmer Richard HAYES, Appellant.
No. 62377.
Supreme Court of Missouri, Division No. 1.
Nov. 10, 1981.
Rehearing Denied Dec. 8, 1981.

Page 17

Thomas Patrick Deaton, Jr., St. Louis, for appellant.

John Landwehr, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

ROBERT R. WELBORN, Senior Judge.

Appeal from conviction upon jury verdict of guilt for robbery, first degree, § 569.020, RSMo 1978, assault, first degree, § 565.050, RSMo 1978, and kidnapping, § 565.110, RSMo 1978, with life sentences for robbery and assault and 30 years' imprisonment for kidnapping.

The state's uncontradicted evidence, including the appellant's admissions, established the facts of the offenses as follows:

At around 3:00 P.M., on June 20, 1979, the appellant, Elmer Richard Hayes, entered the office of the Northwestern Savings and Loan Association in Florissant, Missouri, exhibited a gun to a teller and demanded money. The teller handed him some $1,600 and Hayes left. A workman at an adjacent restaurant noted Hayes' departure and gave police a description of the vehicle Hayes was driving.

Detective Sergeant Jay Noser of the Florissant Police Department responded to the police call of the holdup. En route to the scene in an unmarked police car, he heard a police broadcast describing the robber's car and the direction of its travel. Sergeant Noser proceeded in that direction and in the vicinity of the intersection of Routes 67 and 367 in North St. Louis County he saw a car which fitted the description of the robber's auto. Sergeant Noser pulled in behind the car, turned on his red signal lights and the vehicle pulled to the right of the roadway.

Noser stopped behind the vehicle and called his dispatcher to tell him that he had stopped the vehicle. While he was doing so, Hayes got out of the stopped vehicle and started firing a pistol at the officer. Shots fired through the windshield struck the officer. Hayes then went to the driver's side of the police car and fired several shots point blank at the officer. Noser was struck by eight bullets, but he survived the attack. He fired his weapon at Hayes' vehicle as it left the scene.

Shortly thereafter, Hayes drove his vehicle into an open garage at the Roeder residence in North St. Louis County. He came to the house and produced a weapon on the three occupants who had come to the front porch, 15-year-old Paul Roeder, his 17-year-old

Page 18

sister, Regina, and 83-year-old Frank Schloemer, the Roeder's gardener. Hayes told the trio that he had just robbed a bank and killed a policeman, but that, if they would just be quiet, everything would be all right. After Hayes shaved off his mustache and changed his shirt for one of the Roeder's, he and Regina at his direction tied up Paul and Schloemer. Hayes and Regina then, on Hayes' order, left with Regina driving the Roeder's family car and Hayes in the front passenger seat holding a gun covered with a road map.

Hayes told Regina to drive to the country. She drove west on Route I-70 in St. Charles County. Paul and Schloemer freed themselves and called police. A highway patrolman who heard a broadcast description of the Roeder auto spotted it and started in pursuit. Hayes was aware of the following patrol vehicle. He suggested that Regina pull off the highway at the Lake St. Louis Exit. She did so, but the exit roadway was blocked by a police car. The patrol car followed the Roeder vehicle and, with police cars at the front and rear, Regina stopped the car and Hayes surrendered to the officers without resistance.

He was taken to the St. Charles County jail. When FBI men there identified themselves to Hayes and told him they wanted to question him, Hayes responded: "What do you want to know? I robbed the bank. I shot that police officer." After being given Miranda warnings, Hayes made a detailed statement, admitting the occurrences. He later made a tape-recorded statement which was used in evidence at his trial.

A jury found appellant guilty of robbery in the first degree, first degree assault and kidnapping. The jury assessed a punishment of life imprisonment for each of the first two offenses and 15 years' imprisonment for the third. The trial court found the appellant a dangerous offender, based upon two prior convictions for murder second degree. The sentence of the trial court was to consecutive life terms for the robbery and assault and an extended term of 30 years for kidnapping, also consecutive, the three sentences to run consecutively to a 50-year sentence previously imposed upon appellant. This appeal followed.

In this Court, appellant's first claim of error is based upon the trial court's overruling of his motion for a change of venue because the inordinate amount of publicity which the cause had received so prejudiced the inhabitants of St. Louis County and surrounding geographic areas that he did not receive a fair and impartial trial.

Appellant's motion for change of venue was taken up on April 7, 1980. At that time, appellant's counsel introduced fourteen exhibits, consisting of articles from St. Louis newspapers regarding the events of June 20, 1979, and transcripts of television accounts of the incident. Appellant points out that the newspaper article appearing on the front page of the St. Louis Globe Democrat for June 21, 1979, bore the headline: "Escaped killer held in shooting of officer, abduction"; that other newspaper articles of June 22, 1979, recounted that appellant had admitted the offenses of which he was accused; that other...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 practice notes
  • Gilmore v. Armontrout, Nos. 88-1378
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • November 10, 1988
    ...review. As noted by the district court, despite the applicability of Missouri's contemporaneous objection rule, see State v. Hayes, 624 S.W.2d 16, 20 (Mo.1981), Gilmore's trial attorney did not object to the prosecutor's closing argument, nor did he raise the issue of the propriety of the c......
  • State v. Freeman, No. 13842
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • November 26, 1985
    ...a life sentence for armed criminal action was affirmed. In the following cases, life sentences for assault were affirmed: State v. Hayes, 624 S.W.2d 16 (Mo.1981); State v. Barmann, 689 S.W.2d 758 (Mo.App.1985); Davis v. State, 657 S.W.2d 677 (Mo.App.1983); State v. Mayhue, 653 S.W.2d 227 (M......
  • State v. Walton, No. 72462
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • September 20, 1990
    ...a potential juror be stricken when such knowledge does not preclude them from reaching a verdict based upon the evidence. State v. Hayes, 624 S.W.2d 16, 19 (Mo.1981); State v. Thompson, 723 S.W.2d at 84 (Mo.App.1987). Familiarity with some of the facts of a case without formation of an opin......
  • State v. Thompson, No. 14118
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • January 5, 1987
    ...juror be stricken when such knowledge does not preclude their reaching a verdict based upon the evidence at trial. State v. Hayes, 624 S.W.2d 16, 19 Exposure to publicity is not deemed inherently prejudicial and a juror may be sworn if he is able to set aside any opinion formed from the pub......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
  • Gilmore v. Armontrout, Nos. 88-1378
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • November 10, 1988
    ...review. As noted by the district court, despite the applicability of Missouri's contemporaneous objection rule, see State v. Hayes, 624 S.W.2d 16, 20 (Mo.1981), Gilmore's trial attorney did not object to the prosecutor's closing argument, nor did he raise the issue of the propriety of the c......
  • State v. Freeman, No. 13842
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • November 26, 1985
    ...a life sentence for armed criminal action was affirmed. In the following cases, life sentences for assault were affirmed: State v. Hayes, 624 S.W.2d 16 (Mo.1981); State v. Barmann, 689 S.W.2d 758 (Mo.App.1985); Davis v. State, 657 S.W.2d 677 (Mo.App.1983); State v. Mayhue, 653 S.W.2d 227 (M......
  • State v. Walton, No. 72462
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • September 20, 1990
    ...a potential juror be stricken when such knowledge does not preclude them from reaching a verdict based upon the evidence. State v. Hayes, 624 S.W.2d 16, 19 (Mo.1981); State v. Thompson, 723 S.W.2d at 84 (Mo.App.1987). Familiarity with some of the facts of a case without formation of an opin......
  • State v. Thompson, No. 14118
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • January 5, 1987
    ...juror be stricken when such knowledge does not preclude their reaching a verdict based upon the evidence at trial. State v. Hayes, 624 S.W.2d 16, 19 Exposure to publicity is not deemed inherently prejudicial and a juror may be sworn if he is able to set aside any opinion formed from the pub......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT