State v. Henry, 1.

Decision Date22 January 1937
Docket NumberNo. 1.,1.
Citation188 A. 918
PartiesSTATE of New Jersey, Defendant in Error v. Sidney L. HENRY et al., Plaintiffs in Error.
CourtNew Jersey Supreme Court

Error to Supreme Court.

Lester C. Leonard, of Red Bank, for plaintiff in error.

T. Raymond Bazley, of Long Branch, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court, and reported in State v. Loog, 179 A. 623, 13 N.J.Misc. 536.

For affirmance: The CHANCELLOR, Justices TRENCHARD, CASE, HEHER, and PERSKIE, and Judges HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, and COLE—11.

For reversal: None.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Buckley v. Huston
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • May 22, 1972
    ...74 S.Ct. 124, 98 L.Ed. 379 (1953); State v. Loog, 13 N.J.Misc. 536, 541, 179 A. 623 (Sup.Ct.1935), aff'd sub nom., State v. Henry, 117 N.J.L. 442, 188 A. 918 (E. & A. 1937); Hetfield v. The Central Railroad Co., 29 N.J.L. 571, 573 (E. & A. 1862); State v. Norton, et al., 23 N.J.L. 33, 40 In......
  • State v. W. U. Tel. Co.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • June 1, 1953
    ...specifically abolishing the common law, such will not be its interpretation. Affirmed on the opinion below in State v. Henry, 117 N.J.L. 442, 188 A. 918 (E. & A.1937). In State v. Berman, 120 N.J.L. 381, 199 A. 776, 777 (Sup.Ct.1938), the court said: 'While we find no definition of a disord......
  • State v. Aircraft Supplies, Inc.
    • United States
    • New Jersey County Court
    • April 26, 1957
    ...a misdemeanor under N.J.S. 2A:85--1, N.J.S.A. State v. Loog, 179 A. 623, 13 N.J.Misc. 536 (Sup.Ct.1935), affirmed State v. Henry, 117 N.J.L. 442, 188 A. 918 (E. & A.1937); State v. O'Brien, 136 N.J.L. 118, 54 A.2d 806 (Sup.Ct. In Johnson v. State, 26 N.J.L. 313, 321 (Sup.Ct.1857), affirmed ......
  • State v. Hernandez
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • May 12, 1978
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT