State v. Herndon
Decision Date | 03 May 1988 |
Docket Number | No. 87-0357-CR,87-0357-CR |
Citation | 426 N.W.2d 347,145 Wis.2d 91 |
Parties | STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Leonard HERNDON, Defendant-Appellant. |
Court | Wisconsin Court of Appeals |
Donald J. Hanaway, Atty. Gen. by Sally Wellman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Madison, for plaintiff-respondent.
Kenneth P. Casey, Asst. State Public Defender, Madison, for defendant-appellant.
Before MOSER, P.J., and WEDEMEYER and SULLIVAN, JJ.
Leonard Herndon (Herndon) appeals from a conviction of third-degree sexual assault in violation of sec. 940.225(3), Stats. Herndon claims that he was denied his right to confrontation under the sixth amendment of the United States Constitution and article I, section 7 of the Wisconsin Constitution when he was denied the opportunity to cross-examine M.L.P., the juvenile complaining witness, about her prior arrests for prostitution. Herndon argues that an effective cross-examination was necessary to test M.L.P.'s credibility and to show her motive to fabricate the charge. Herndon also claims that he was denied his constitutional right to present witnesses in his own behalf. Herndon argues that the trial court erred in holding that Wisconsin's rape shield law, sec. 972.11(2), Stats., precluded any evidence of M.L.P.'s prior sexual conduct.
The sole issue on appeal is whether Herndon was denied his constitutional right to confrontation and right to present witnesses in his own behalf. We hold that he was and reverse the judgment of the trial court.
M.L.P. testified at a preliminary hearing that on March 24, 1986, at about 2 a.m., while she was walking to her mother's home, Herndon sexually assaulted her in the 2400 block of North Martin Luther King Drive. M.L.P. testified that Herndon forced her into his automobile, drove her to a parking lot located near the intersection of Martin Luther King Drive and West Vine Street in the city of Milwaukee, and forced her to commit several acts of oral and vaginal intercourse. M.L.P. further testified that Herndon struck her in the eye and that he later drove his automobile to North 4th Street and West Clark Street and let her out. Based on this evidence, the court found that there was probable cause to believe that a sexual assault had occurred and that Herndon had committed it. Herndon was bound over for trial.
On the trial date, the trial court entertained Herndon's motion to have the rape shield law declared unconstitutional. Herndon presented the following written offer of proof with which the state joined:
The trial court, relying on sec. 972.11(2)(c), Stats., refused to allow any testimony or reference to M.L.P.'s prior sexual conduct. 1 After being advised of his rights, Herndon agreed to go ahead with the trial to the court and to allow the court to use the preliminary hearing evidence as the basis for its findings of fact and conclusions of law. Upon reading the preliminary hearing transcript, the court found Herndon guilty of second-degree sexual assault. Herndon was sentenced to an indeterminate term of four years incarceration to be served consecutively to the term he was then serving as a result of a parole revocation. It is from this judgment that Herndon appeals.
CONFRONT ADVERSE WITNESSES AND PRESENT WITNESSES
The sixth amendment to the United States Constitution guarantee...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Gregory
...there was no evident reason for her to lie to avoid trouble with the police. 9. Another case has been clarified. See State v. Herndon, 145 Wis.2d 91, 426 N.W.2d 347 (1988), limited by State v. Pulizzano, 155 Wis.2d 633, 456 N.W.2d 325, 335 (1990) (requiring evidence of prior sexual conduct ......
-
State v. Hammer
...victims. The circuit court ruled the evidence inadmissible after taking into account the six-part test in State v. Herndon, 145 Wis. 2d 91, 122-23, 426 N.W.2d 347 (Ct. App. 1988), overruled on other grounds, State v. Pulizzano, 155 Wis. 2d 633, 644, 456 N.W.2d 325 (1990), which was later mo......
-
State v. Crims
...420 N.W.2d 145, 154-56 (1988); Williams, 487 N.E.2d at 561-63; Green, 163 W. Va. at 692-93, 260 S.E.2d at 264; State v. Herndon, 145 Wis.2d 91, 426 N.W.2d 347, 361-63 (App.1988), overruled in part by State v. Pulizzano, 155 Wis.2d 633, 456 N.W.2d 325, 330 (1990) (overruling issue of statute......
-
State v. Pulizzano
...probative value on the issue of consent to justify extensive inquiry into the victim's sexual history." State v. Herndon, 145 Wis.2d 91, 104-05, 426 N.W.2d 347 (Ct.App.1988); State v. Vonesh, 135 Wis.2d 477, 484, 401 N.W.2d 170 (Ct.App.1986). Evidence of a woman's prior sexual conduct was h......
-
§ 33.07 Proving Rape at Trial
...that V had previously offered other men sex in exchange for drugs was inadmissible under the rape-shield statute).[168] State v. Herndon, 426 N.W.2d 347, 361 (Wis. Ct. App. 1988), overruled on other grounds, State v. Pulizzano, 456 N.W.2d 325 (Wis....
-
§ 33.07 PROVING RAPE AT TRIAL
...V had previously offered other men sex in exchange for drugs was inadmissible under the rape-shield statute).[168] . State v. Herndon, 426 N.W.2d 347, 361 (Wis. Ct. App. 1988), overruled on other grounds, State v. Pulizzano, 456 N.W.2d 325 (Wis. 1990). ...
-
TABLE OF CASES
...219 Hernandez, State v., 320 P.2d 467 (Ariz. 1958), 312 Hernandez, State v., 815 S.W.2d 67 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991), 512 Herndon, State v., 426 N.W.2d 347 (Wis. Ct. App. 1988), 569 Herrera, State v., 895 P.2d 359 (Utah 1995), 340 Hicks v. United States, 150 U.S. 442 (1893), 444, 445 Hicks, State......