State v. Hessler

Docket NumberS-11-379
Decision Date23 December 2011
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
32 cases
  • State v. Edwards
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • September 28, 2012
    ...Neb. 618, 798 N.W.2d 832 (2011). 12. See, e.g., Boppre, supra note 5. 13. See, e.g., Iromuanya, supra note 9. 14. See State v. Hessler, 282 Neb. 935, 807 N.W.2d 504 (2011). 15. See Iromuanya, supra note 9. 16.Id. 17.Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (198......
  • State v. Vanderpool
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • June 21, 2013
    ...6.State v. Yos–Chiguil, 281 Neb. 618, 798 N.W.2d 832 (2011). 7.Id. 8.Id. 9.State v. Watt, 285 Neb. 647, 832 N.W.2d 459 (2013). 10.Id. 11.Id. 12.State v. Hessler, 282 Neb. 935, 807 N.W.2d 504 (2011). 13.State v. Yos–Chiguil, supra note 6. 14.State v. Poindexter, 277 Neb. 936, 766 N.W.2d 391 ......
  • State v. Purdy
    • United States
    • Nebraska Court of Appeals
    • July 3, 2017
    ...be used to secure review of issues that were known to the defendant and could have been litigated on direct appeal. State v. Hessler, 282 Neb. 935, 807 N.W.2d 504 (2011). As we mentioned above, Purdy was represented by different counsel than his trial attorney on direct appeal. And, while h......
  • State v. Fox
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • December 30, 2011
    ...lacking “mental capacity.” Indiana v. Edwards, 554 U.S. 164, 177, 128 S.Ct. 2379, 171 L.Ed.2d 345 (2008). See, also, State v. Hessler, 282 Neb. 935, 807 N.W.2d 504 (2011). We have stated that a person is competent to stand trial if he or she has the capacity to understand the nature and obj......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT