State v. Hewes

Citation60 Kan. 765,57 P. 959
Decision Date08 July 1899
Docket Number11336
PartiesTHE STATE OF KANSAS v. ALLIE HEWES
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July, 1899.

Appeal from Kingman district court; G. W. MCKAY, judge.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded for new trial.

A. A Godard, attorney-general, J. Q. Jenkins, county attorney, and John E. Lydecker, for The State.

Milton Brown, and C. W. Fairchild, for the appellant.

OPINION

JOHNSTON, J.:

In an information filed by the state against Allie Hewes, he was charged with the murder of Robert Bomar by hitting him with a club, and by shooting him, the said Robert Bomar, with a certain pistol commonly called a revolver, then and there loaded with powder and leaden bullets, which said pistol so as aforesaid loaded with powder, leaden bullets and caps he, the said Allie Hewes, then and there in his hands had and held, contrary to the statute in such cases made and provided." The testimony at the trial showed beyond dispute that the defendant shot Bomar twice, that he did not assault or hit him with a club, and that the death of Bomar resulted from the shooting. The jury found the defendant guilty of manslaughter in the third degree, and, although he was less than sixteen years of age, he was sentenced to confinement at hard labor in the penitentiary for a period of one year.

The first complaint is that the information is so indefinite and uncertain that it does not notify the defendant of the precise offense charged against him. As will be observed, the charge is that the defendant assaulted Bomar with a club and also with a pistol, and it is argued that it is bad for duplicity, and uncertainty because it does not particularly state whether, Bomar's death resulted from clubbing or shooting. As the offense charged may be committed by both means, and as several acts connected with and forming part of the general offense may be stated in a single count, the objection of the defendant is not good. It has already been held that "where a murder may have been committed by different means, and it is doubtful which was employed, its commission by all may be charged in one count of the information, and proof of any one will sustain the allegation, but the means so charged in the same count of the information must not be repugnant." (The State v. O'Neil, 51 Kan. 651, 33 P. 287.)

The defendant filed a plea in abatement alleging that he had not had a preliminary examination upon the offense charged in the information, and that he had not waived such examination. A jury was demanded to try this plea and error is predicated upon refusal of the demand. It appears, however, that the plea itself was fatally defective. Informations may be filed against fugitives from justice without a preliminary examination, and there was nothing in the plea in question to show that the defendant was not a fugitive from justice when the information was filed. "Such pleas must be certain to every intent, and leave nothing to be drawn by inference. They must anticipate and include all such supposable matter as would, if alleged by the opposite party, defeat the plea." (1 Encycl. Pl. & Pr. 24.)

A great number of objections are made to rulings upon the testimony. Many of these objections are without merit, and some of the rulings, although erroneous, are not so prejudicial in character as to furnish grounds for a reversal. Objections are made, however, which are so serious in character that they cannot be overlooked. The mother of the deceased was permitted to testify that one of the Hewes children had told her that Allie Hewes, the defendant, said "that the one that shot the dog he would shoot them." The trouble between the Bomar and Hewes families resulted from the shooting of a dog by Robert Bomar on the day that he was killed by Allie Hewes. The Hewes children went to Bomar's to obtain a pail of water and the dog accompanied them. While there Bomar shot and killed the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • State v. Vance
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • 13 Julio 1910
    ... ... State, 39 Oh. St. 37.) ... Where ... an offense charged may be committed by two different means, ... not only may its commission by both means be charged in one ... count, but proof of the offense committed by either means ... will sustain the allegation. ( State v. Hewes [Kan.], ... 57 P. 959; State v. O'Neil, 51 Kan. 651; ... Bishop's New Crim. Pro., vol. 1, sec. 453, sub-division ... 2; Com. v. Stafford, 12 Cushing 619; Com. v ... Macloon, 101 Mass. 1.) ... The ... evidence for the prosecution should not be held insufficient ... solely ... ...
  • State v. Carr
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • 27 Enero 1940
    ...its commission by both means may be charged in one count of the information, and proof of either will sustain the allegation. State v. Hewes, 60 Kan. 765, syl. par. 1, 57 P. 8. The record in a criminal prosecution examined, and held (a) The statute under which the prosecution was had is con......
  • State v. Patterson
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • 7 Marzo 1903
    ... ... the plea was overruled. Conceding that a defendant is ... entitled to a trial by jury of an issue of fact under a plea ... in abatement, the appellant suffered nothing by the ... court's rulings. A plea in abatement must be certain to ... every intent. (The State v. Hewes, 60 Kan. 765, 57 ... P. 959.) It will not be aided by any intendment whatever, is ... construed with the utmost strictness, and must "contain ... a full, direct and positive averment of all material ... facts." (1 Encyc. Pl. & Pr. 23.) The statement that ... defendant had no preliminary ... ...
  • State v. Oliphant, 46638
    • United States
    • Kansas Supreme Court
    • 4 Noviembre 1972
    ...and with which he is in no manner connected, and has in no manner assented to. . . .' (p. 202, 38 P. p. 304.) See, also, State v. Hewes, 60 Kan. 765, 57 P. 959, where the foregoing passage is quoted at page 768, 57 P. at page But we need not look to our early case law to ascertain that hear......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT